Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

06:36
Elastic Staining on Paraffin-embedded Slides of pT3N0M0 Gastric Cancer Tissue
Published on: May 1, 2019
6.4K
Nuclear artifacts in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens: A clinicopathological study
Susumu Matsukuma1, Hiroaki Takeo2, Kimiya Sato2
1Health Care Center, Japan Self-Defense Forces Central Hospital, Tokyo 154-0001, Japan ; Department of Pathology, Japan Self-Defense Forces Central Hospital, Tokyo 154-0001, Japan.
Molecular and Clinical Oncology
|July 24, 2014
Summary
Nuclear artifacts, including multinucleated and atypical mitotic figures, are common in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) specimens. These changes, often mimicking dysplasia, are related to the ESD procedure and marking, not true neoplasia.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Pathology
- Oncology
Background:
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique for gastric lesion resection.
- Histopathological evaluation of ESD specimens is crucial for diagnosis and treatment planning.
- Nuclear artifacts can complicate the interpretation of gastric ESD specimens.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize nuclear artifacts observed in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) specimens.
- To differentiate ESD-related artifacts from true neoplastic changes like dysplasia.
- To identify factors associated with the development of these artifacts.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 97 gastric ESD specimens from 79 patients.
- Comparison with 69 age- and gender-matched control gastrectomy specimens.
- Histopathological examination for multinucleated figures, atypical mitotic figures, and architectural abnormalities.
Main Results:
- Nuclear artifacts (multinucleated/atypical mitotic figures) were found in 71% of ESD specimens, primarily near marking areas.
- These artifacts mimicked dysplasia in 13 specimens but showed degenerative changes in deeper sections.
- Artifacts were associated with specimen size, marking frequency, and prior marking, but not with aggressive behavior on follow-up.
Conclusions:
- The observed nuclear changes are artifacts related to the ESD procedure and marking.
- These artifacts can be mistaken for dysplasia, particularly in older patients.
- Distinguishing ESD-related artifacts from true dysplasia is essential for accurate diagnosis and patient management.

