Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Absolute eosinophils count and the extent of coronary artery disease: a single centre cohort study
Monica Verdoia1, Alon Schaffer, Ettore Cassetti
1Department of Cardiology, Ospedale "Maggiore della Carità", Eastern Piedmont University, C.so Mazzini, 18, 28100, Novara, Italy.
Insights
Higher absolute eosinophils count (AEC) in patients undergoing coronary angiography is not independently linked to coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence or severity. Findings suggest associations are confounded by cardiovascular risk factors.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hematology
- Immunology
Background:
- Leukocytes play a role in atherosclerosis pathogenesis.
- Eosinophils are implicated in various cardiovascular pathologies.
- Limited data exist on the association between absolute eosinophils count (AEC) and coronary artery disease (CAD).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between AEC and the prevalence and extent of CAD.
- To evaluate the independent role of eosinophils in CAD among patients undergoing coronary angiography.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 3,742 consecutive patients undergoing non-urgent coronary angiography.
- Patients categorized into tertiles based on AEC.
- Coronary artery disease assessed by Quantitative Coronary Angiography; significant CAD defined as stenosis >50%, severe CAD as left main and/or trivessel disease.
Main Results:
- Higher AEC associated with male gender, cardiovascular risk factors, and prior revascularization.
- AEC positively correlated with platelets, hemoglobin, white blood cells, creatinine, triglycerides, and glycosylated hemoglobin; inversely with HDL cholesterol.
- AEC linked to multivessel disease, chronic occlusions, and in-stent restenosis; inversely with intracoronary thrombus. AEC associated with CAD prevalence (p=0.049) but not severe CAD extent (p=0.31).
Conclusions:
- Higher AEC is not independently associated with CAD prevalence or extent in patients undergoing coronary angiography.
- The observed associations between AEC and CAD appear confounded by established cardiovascular risk factors.
- Eosinophils do not demonstrate an independent role in CAD pathogenesis or severity in this cohort.
Abstract:
Leukocytes have been involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, and recent attention has been raised on eosinophils, that have been claimed for a wide number of cardiovascular pathologies, affecting endocardium, myocardium and vascular walls. However, few data have been reported so far on the relationship between absolute eosinophils count (AEC) and the prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD), that was the aim of present study. Consecutive patients undergoing non-urgent coronary angiography were included. Haematological parameters were measured at admission. Significant CAD was defined as at least 1 vessel stenosis >50 %, while severe CAD as left main and/or trivessel disease, as evaluated by Quantitative Coronary Angiography. Our population is represented by 3,742 patients, divided according to tertiles values of AEC (≤0.1; 0.1-0.2; >0.2 × 10(3)/µl). Higher eosinophils values were significantly associated to male gender, main established cardiovascular risk factors, previous percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularization, antihypertensive and antiplatelet therapy at admission but inversely with acute presentation. Higher AEC was directly related with platelets count (p < 0.001), haemoglobin levels (p = 0.02), white blood cells count (p = 0.02), higher serum creatinine (p < 0.001), triglycerides (p < 0.001) and glycosylated haemoglobin (p < 0.001), while inversely with HDL cholesterol (p < 0.001). AEC was associated with multivessel disease (p = 0.03), chronic occlusions (p = 0.01), in-stent restenosis (p = 0.002), while inversely with the presence of intracoronary thrombus (p < 0.001). A significant relationship was found between AEC and the prevalence of coronary artery disease (p = 0.049), but not for the extent of more severe LM/trivessel CAD (p = 0.31). At multivariate analysis no independent role of eosinophils was found for CAD (adjusted OR [95 % CI] = 1.02 [0.91-1.15], p = 0.70), or severe CAD (adjusted OR [95 % CI] = 0.99 [0.89-1.1], p = 0.9), even when considering separately acute and elective patients. In conclusion, among patients undergoing coronary angiography, higher eosinophils levels are not independently associated with the prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease, but appear confounded by their link with major cardiovascular risk factors.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
08:51Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
Published on: September 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests