Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Critical Thinking II

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:

Reasoning

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...

Critical Thinking I

Critical Thinking I

Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career...

Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...

Intelligence

Intelligence

The term "intelligence" is complex because it refers to both behavior and individuals, and its interpretation varies across cultures. European Americans tend to link intelligence with reasoning and cognitive skills, while in Kenya, it is tied to responsible participation in family and social life. In Uganda, intelligence is seen as the ability to know the right actions and carry them out effectively, while the Iatmul people of Papua New Guinea associate it with the capacity to remember...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Political bias in interpreting social media for forensic purposes: An introductory editorial essay.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2024

Same author

Introduction to special issue on social media for forensic mental evaluations.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2024

Same author

The Internet is a scary place: How does evidence source and examinee race or ethnicity influence determinations of threat?

Behavioral sciences & the law·2024

Same author

Psychopathy in Correctional Settings: Considerations for Developing and Implementing a Treatment Program.

Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care·2023

Same author

Editorial: Mental illnesses within correctional populations.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2023

Same author

MMPI-2-RF Differences Between Violent Offending and Institutional Violence Among Incarcerated Women.

Violence and victims·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Competency to Proceed to Trial Evaluations and Rational Understanding.

Laurie Ragatz¹, Michael J Vitacco², Rozanna Tross¹

¹Georgia Regents University, Augusta, USA.

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

|August 1, 2014

Summary

The Supreme Court requires "rational understanding" for trial competency. This article clarifies its definition by reviewing legal and scholarly sources to improve evaluations for defendants facing trial.

Keywords:

competency to stand trial rational understanding restoration of competency

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion

Published on: January 20, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion

Published on: January 20, 2019

Area of Science:

Forensic Psychology
Legal Psychology
Psycholegal Studies

Background:

The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Dusky v. United States mandated "rational understanding" for competency to stand trial.
Inconsistent judicial interpretations and a lack of defined rationality have led to significant misunderstanding of this legal standard.
This ambiguity impacts the consistent and accurate assessment of a defendant's fitness to proceed in legal proceedings.

Purpose of the Study:

To enhance the conceptualization of rational understanding within the context of competency to proceed to trial evaluations.
To provide a clear framework for understanding rationality in psycholegal assessments.
To aid legal and mental health professionals in conducting more precise competency evaluations.

Main Methods:

A comprehensive review of landmark legal decisions, including Dusky v. United States.
Analysis of scholarly articles and legal literature that define and discuss rationality.
Examination of standardized competency assessment instruments and their psychometric properties.

Main Results:

Identified inconsistencies in legal definitions and applications of "rational understanding."
Highlighted the potential of standardized psycholegal instruments to offer a valid metric for assessing rational abilities.
Demonstrated how case law and psycholegal research can inform operational definitions of rationality.

Conclusions:

A clearer conceptualization of rational understanding is crucial for improving the quality of competency to stand trial evaluations.
Integrating legal precedent with psycholegal research offers a path toward more nuanced and reliable assessments.
Clinicians can enhance their evaluations by thoroughly understanding the multifaceted nature of rationality in legal contexts.