Effectiveness of pH measurements in predicting feeding tube placement

N Metheny1, P Williams, L Wiersema

  • 1Saint Louis University Medical Center, Missouri.

Nursing Research
|September 1, 1989
PubMed

Insights

Gastric pH testing effectively distinguishes feeding tube placement. Aspirate pH values reliably differentiate gastric from intestinal or respiratory placement, enhancing patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Medicine
  • Gastroenterology
  • Critical Care Medicine

Background:

  • Accurate feeding tube placement is crucial for patient safety and effective nutrition delivery.
  • Misplacement of nasogastric (NG) and nasointestinal (NI) tubes can lead to serious complications.
  • Distinguishing between gastric, intestinal, and respiratory placement is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of aspirate pH testing in differentiating feeding tube placement.
  • To compare pH values of aspirates from gastric, intestinal, and respiratory locations.
  • To determine the clinical utility of pH measurements for confirming tube position.

Main Methods:

  • A clinical study involving 181 adult subjects with small-bore nasogastric or nasointestinal tubes.
  • Collection of aspirate samples for pH measurement using pH-paper concurrently with X-rays.
  • pH readings were taken at initial placement and after 1-2 days of tube feedings.

Main Results:

  • pH values effectively differentiated gastric from intestinal placement (p < .0001).
  • 81% of nasogastric aspirates showed pH 1-4, while 88% of nasointestinal aspirates had pH ≥ 6.
  • An aspirate from a tube in the lung exhibited an alkaline pH.

Conclusions:

  • Aspirate pH testing is a valuable, non-invasive method for verifying feeding tube placement.
  • pH measurements can reliably distinguish gastric from intestinal placement.
  • This technique can help prevent complications associated with incorrect tube positioning.

Related Concept Videos

Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding01:26

Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding

Enteral nutrition delivers nutrients directly to the stomach or small intestine through a tube. This method is appropriate for patients who cannot eat but still have a functioning digestive system. It is also beneficial for individuals with swallowing difficulties, anorexia, malabsorption, or those who have undergone gastrointestinal (GI) surgery.
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding01:15

Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding

Enteral nutrition encompasses various methods of delivering nutrition directly to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, bypassing traditional oral intake. It is particularly beneficial for patients who cannot eat by mouth but have a functioning digestive system. Key methods include nasointestinal feeding, gastrostomy, and jejunostomy, each suited to different clinical scenarios based on the patient's needs and condition.
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition01:27

Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition

Parenteral Nutrition (PN) delivers essential nutrients directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the digestive system. It is commonly used for individuals with severe digestive disorders or conditions that prevent normal nutrient absorption.
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods01:20

Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods

Pharmacodynamic methods provide insights into a drug's effects on physiological processes over time and play a crucial role in understanding bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy. These methods can be broadly classified into acute pharmacological and therapeutic response approaches, each with distinct mechanisms and applications.The acute pharmacological response method directly correlates a drug's physiological effects, such as ECG or pupil diameter changes, to its time course in the body.
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test01:22

Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test

In clinical practice, the direct measurement of hepatic blood flow to evaluate liver function presents significant challenges due to the intricate and specialized nature of the necessary techniques. Consequently, healthcare professionals often rely on empirical estimates derived from thorough patient examinations and liver function tests to gauge liver health. Among the tools at their disposal, the Child–Pugh and MELD scoring systems stand out for their ability to categorize and assess the...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).