Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
Published on: January 7, 2019
Sample Size Justification in Quantitative Research
1Alicja Rogusz, PhD, MSc, PGCE in HE, PGDip, MSc, RN, University of Sunderland School of Nursing, Sunderland, UK.
Background:
Sample-size justification remains a central element of quantitative research, yet classical a priori power analysis is frequently applied to designs for which it is neither required nor conceptually appropriate. When power calculations are used indiscriminately, they may misalign with the aims of studies that do not need them. This poses challenges for researchers and student nurses, particularly those without specialist training in statistics, and can lead to methodological inconsistencies across the published nursing literature.
Objectives:
In this paper, I aim to clarify how sample-size justification can be aligned with study purpose and to describe design-appropriate alternatives to traditional hypothesis-testing power analysis in common, non-inferential nursing studies.
Methods:
This conceptual discussion of the methodological and statistical literature examines the assumptions underlying classical power analysis and identifies study designs in which these assumptions may not hold. The discussion groups commonly use quantitative designs by primary purpose and presents alternative justification frameworks.
Results:
Part A illustrates common research contexts in which traditional power analysis may not be appropriate and presents the methodological rationale for alternative approaches to sample-size justification. In Part B, alternative approaches are presented, such as confidence-interval precision planning and detectable-effect reporting that offer more coherent and transparent approaches to sample-size reasoning. A summary table provides practical sample-size calculation guide with examples. Part C contains a practice experience reflection.
Discussion:
Aligning sample-size justification with the methodological purpose of the study strengthens transparency, improves conceptual coherence, and enhances ethical accountability. Misapplication of power analysis can lead to unstable effect-size estimates, misinterpretation, and inefficient use of research resources. A design-specific approach can therefore help maintain methodological rigor across quantitative nursing research.
Related Concept Videos
Sample Size Calculation
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Random Sampling Method
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
