Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Dosimetry modeling for focal high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
Josh Mason1, Bashar Al-Qaisieh2, Peter Bownes2
1Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, St. James's Institute of Oncology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK; Academic Unit of Medical Physics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Focal high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (HEMI and UF) offers improved target coverage and reduced organ-at-risk dose compared to whole-gland (WG) treatment. However, focal plans are more sensitive to source position errors.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Urologic Oncology
Background:
- High-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy is a primary treatment for localized prostate cancer.
- Optimizing dose delivery while minimizing toxicity to surrounding organs is crucial for treatment success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the dosimetry of whole-gland (WG), hemi-gland (HEMI), and ultra-focal (UF) HDR prostate brachytherapy plans.
- To assess the impact of source position errors and utilize Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for dosimetric analysis.
Main Methods:
- Delineation of tumor volumes from MRI and biopsy for 9 patients.
- Creation of WG, HEMI, and UF treatment plans for 19 Gy single fraction monotherapy.
- Assessment of plan robustness to systematic source position shifts (1-4 mm).
- MC simulations to evaluate the dosimetric impact of steel catheters.
Main Results:
- HEMI and UF plans achieved higher D90 and V100 values for the target volumes compared to WG plans.
- Significant reductions in urethra and rectal dose were observed with HEMI and UF plans (e.g., rectal D2cc: 12.5 Gy for WG vs. 4.6 Gy for UF).
- Focal plans (UF) showed increased sensitivity to source position errors, with a 2 mm shift reducing F-PTV D90 by 8.3%.
Conclusions:
- HEMI and UF HDR prostate brachytherapy can deliver superior target coverage (D90) with lower organ-at-risk doses compared to WG treatments.
- Focal treatment strategies necessitate careful attention to source positioning due to increased sensitivity to positional errors.
- MC simulations confirmed the dosimetric accuracy across all plan types, with minimal impact (<2%) on DVH parameters from catheters.
More Related Videos
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022