Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Preparation, Procedures and Evaluation of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
Published on: January 4, 2019
Platelet-rich plasma in rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized study
Eduardo Angeli Malavolta1, Mauro Emilio Conforto Gracitelli2, Arnaldo Amado Ferreira Neto2
1Shoulder and Elbow Group and Trauma Group, Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil eduardomalavolta@hotmail.com.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) did not significantly improve clinical outcomes or retear rates in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. This study found no substantial benefits of PRP compared to a control group over 24 months.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Regenerative Medicine
- Biologics in Sports Medicine
Background:
- Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is utilized in rotator cuff repair, but clinical trial evidence supporting its benefits remains limited.
- Investigating the efficacy of PRP in enhancing functional and structural recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in improving functional and structural outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
- To compare clinical results and retear rates between patients receiving PRP and a control group.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with Level 1 evidence.
- 27 patients in the PRP group received liquid PRP with autologous thrombin post-arthroscopic single-row repair for supraspinatus tears; 27 served as controls.
- Outcomes assessed via UCLA, Constant scales, VAS pain, and MRI at multiple time points up to 24 months.
Main Results:
- Both groups showed significant clinical improvement (P < .001) from baseline to 24 months.
- No significant differences were observed between PRP and control groups in UCLA, Constant, or VAS scores at 24 months (P > .05).
- A statistically significant difference in UCLA scores was noted at 12 months (P = .046), but not sustained at 24 months. Retear rates were comparable between groups (P = .42).
Conclusions:
- Liquid platelet-rich plasma (PRP) prepared by apheresis and applied with thrombin did not yield superior clinical results at 24-month follow-up for rotator cuff repair.
- The study did not find a significant reduction in retear rates with PRP application in this patient cohort.
More Related Videos
07:51Effects of Allogeneic Platelet-Rich Plasma PRP on the Healing Process of Sectioned Achilles Tendons of Rats: A Methodological Description
Published on: March 19, 2018
05:25Knotless Independent Double-Row Repair and Biceps Augmentation for Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears
Published on: January 23, 2026