Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

2.0K
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
2.0K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

370
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
370

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bilingual representation of multi-word phrases: Evidence from phrase-acceptability judgment in Chinese-English bilinguals.

Cognition·2026
Same author

The role of explicit contextual truth in counterfactual reasoning: ERP evidence from Chinese.

Brain and language·2026
Same author

Electrophysiological evidence of infants' understanding of verbs.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Language choice and naming difficulty: Evidence from bilingual degraded picture naming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

The role of semantics and phonology in bilingual picture naming: Evidence from the phono-translation effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Revisiting bilingual processing: insights from L1 transfer in L2 acquisition.

Brain and language·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 26, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K

Interference in joint picture naming.

Chiara Gambi1, Joris Van de Cavey2, Martin J Pickering1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|August 5, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People take longer to name pictures when they think someone else is also naming pictures. This suggests we track if others speak, but not their specific words.

More Related Videos

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.1K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 26, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K
Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.1K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Speech Production

Background:

  • Understanding how individuals process speech in the presence of others is crucial for explaining social communication.
  • Previous research has explored the impact of concurrent tasks on speech production, but the role of beliefs about a partner's concurrent task remains less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether beliefs about a partner's concurrent task influence an individual's picture naming latencies.
  • To determine if speakers represent the *act* of speaking or the *content* of speech when anticipating a partner's vocalizations.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted involving participants naming pictures.
  • Participants' beliefs about a partner's concurrent task (e.g., picture naming, categorization, silence) were manipulated.
  • Picture naming latencies were measured under different belief conditions.

Main Results:

  • Picture naming latencies were significantly longer when participants believed their partner was also naming pictures compared to when the partner was silent or categorizing pictures.
  • Beliefs about the specific content of the partner's utterance (e.g., same vs. different ordering or lexical content) did not affect picture naming latencies.
  • Participants' response times were influenced by the perceived *engagement* in a concurrent speaking task, not the *specifics* of the speech.

Conclusions:

  • Speakers appear to monitor the general activity of other speakers, specifically whether they are preparing to speak.
  • The findings support a model where individuals represent the likelihood of vocal interaction but not the precise semantic or phonetic content of a partner's speech.
  • This suggests a mechanism for managing conversational turn-taking and interference based on general vocal activity rather than detailed speech content prediction.