Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

16:11
Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection
Published on: April 26, 2014
8.8K
Systematic and random errors in self-mixing measurements: effect of the developing speckle statistics
Applied Optics
|August 5, 2014
Summary
Speckle pattern statistics in self-mixing interferometry (SMI) introduce errors in large displacement measurements. Errors converge to a uniform diffuser model as target roughness increases or spatial correlation decreases, simplifying error analysis.
Area of Science:
- Optical Metrology
- Interferometry
- Speckle Statistics
Background:
- Self-mixing interferometry (SMI) enables sub-wavelength resolution measurements of large displacements.
- Speckle pattern statistics from diffusing targets can introduce significant errors in SMI measurements.
- Understanding these errors is crucial for accurate displacement sensing over extended ranges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze errors in self-mixing interferometer (SMI) displacement measurements caused by target speckle statistics.
- To investigate how target roughness and spatial correlation affect measurement errors.
- To determine the conditions under which these errors converge to a predictable model.
Main Methods:
- Simulated speckle pattern statistics for diffusing targets with varying z-height profiles and spatial correlations.
- Analyzed two cases: developing randomness (increasing σ(z)) and fully developed randomness (σ(z)≫λ) with spatial correlation (ρ(x,y)).
- Evaluated systematic and random errors in self-mixing interferometer (SMI) displacement measurements.
Main Results:
- Measurement errors converge to those of a uniformly illuminated diffuser as target roughness (σ(z)) increases or spatial correlation (ρ(x,y)) decreases.
- This convergence indicates the development of speckle statistics, leading to predictable error behavior.
- Gaussian-distributed amplitude sources show earlier convergence compared to other distributions.
Conclusions:
- Speckle statistics of diffusing targets significantly impact self-mixing interferometer (SMI) displacement measurements.
- A universal error model based on uniform illumination emerges under conditions of high roughness or low spatial correlation.
- Simulation results provide insights into displacement measurement errors versus distance for various source distributions.
Related Concept Videos
Random and Systematic Errors
11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors
970
970
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
93.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
93.8K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
8.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.7K
Random Error
8.2K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
8.2K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
8.7K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
8.7K

