Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026
12:30
Synthesis of a Thiol Building Block for the Crystallization of a Semiconducting Gyroidal Metal-sulfur Framework
Published on: April 9, 2018
8.6K
The two-dimensional coordination polymer
Xiao Min Hao1, Gang Chen2, Chang Sheng Gu1
1Department of Applied Chemistry, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, People's Republic of China.
Acta Crystallographica. Section C, Structural Chemistry
|August 6, 2014
Summary
This study details a novel coordination polymer, [Cd2(SO4)2(C13H8N4)(H2O)2]n, featuring unique cadmium(II) coordination environments. The research reveals its self-assembly into a 3D supramolecular network through sulfate bridging and hydrogen bonding.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Crystallography
Background:
- Coordination polymers are advanced materials with diverse applications.
- Understanding the structure-property relationships of metal-organic frameworks is crucial.
- Cadmium(II) complexes offer versatile coordination chemistry.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize and characterize a novel cadmium(II) coordination polymer.
- To elucidate the crystal structure and coordination behavior of the complex.
- To investigate the self-assembly process leading to a 3D supramolecular network.
Main Methods:
- Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.
- Coordination chemistry techniques.
- Spectroscopic characterization.
Main Results:
- A novel coordination polymer, [Cd2(SO4)2(C13H8N4)(H2O)2]n, was synthesized.
- Two distinct Cd(II) centers exhibit hexacoordinated (distorted octahedral) and heptacoordinated (distorted monocapped anti-trigonal prismatic) geometries.
- Sulfate ligands bridge Cd(II) ions into 1D ladder-like chains, forming 2D layers via 1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline (IP) ligands.
- Interlayer hydrogen bonding connects these layers into a 3D supramolecular network.
Conclusions:
- The study successfully synthesized and characterized a novel cadmium(II) coordination polymer.
- The intricate structure highlights the role of sulfate and IP ligands in directing self-assembly.
- The resulting 3D network demonstrates potential for advanced material applications.
Related Concept Videos
02:42Valence Bond Theory
8.9K
Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
8.9K
02:57Coordination Number and Geometry
15.5K
For transition metal complexes, the coordination number determines the geometry around the central metal ion. Table 1 compares coordination numbers to molecular geometry. The most common structures of the complexes in coordination compounds are octahedral, tetrahedral, and square planar.
15.5K
02:54Coordination Compounds and Nomenclature
21.0K
In most main group element compounds, the valence electrons of the isolated atoms combine to form chemical bonds that satisfy the octet rule. For instance, the four valence electrons of carbon overlap with electrons from four hydrogen atoms to form CH4. The one valence electron leaves sodium and adds to the seven valence electrons of chlorine to form the ionic formula unit NaCl (Figure 1a). Transition metals do not normally bond in this fashion. They primarily form coordinate covalent bonds, a...
21.0K
02:51Metal-Ligand Bonds
19.2K
The hemoglobin in the blood, the chlorophyll in green plants, vitamin B-12, and the catalyst used in the manufacture of polyethylene all contain coordination compounds. Ions of the metals, especially the transition metals, are likely to form complexes.
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
19.2K
02:42Ionic Crystal Structures
17.9K
Ionic crystals consist of two or more different kinds of ions that usually have different sizes. The packing of these ions into a crystal structure is more complex than the packing of metal atoms that are the same size.
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
17.9K
02:46Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
47.5K
Tetrahedral Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than...
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than...
47.5K