Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
A Prospective Multi-Center Audit of Nutrition Support Parameters Following Burn Injury
Rochelle Kurmis1, Kathryn Heath, Selena Ooi
1From the *Adult Burn Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia; †Department of Clinical Dietetics, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia; ‡Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia; §Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia; ‖Nutrition and Dietetics, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; ¶Nutrition and Dietetic Service, Hutt Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand; #Nutrition Department, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia; and **Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Royal Perth Hospital, Western Australia.
Nutrition support for severe burn patients in Australia and New Zealand requires improvement. Audits revealed that prescribed enteral feed volumes and regular patient weighing are key areas needing clinical enhancement for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Nutrition
- Burn Care
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- Effective nutrition support is crucial for severe burn patients.
- Current nutrition provision in clinical practice may be suboptimal.
- Standardized audit criteria are needed to assess nutrition delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a prospective, multi-center audit of nutrition support delivery in severe burn patients.
- To evaluate current practices against the Joanna Briggs Institute Burns Node Nutrition audit criteria.
- To identify areas for clinical improvement in nutrition provision for burn survivors.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multi-center audit across Australia and New Zealand.
- Inclusion of 34 patients with severe burn injury (≥20% TBSA adults, ≥10% TBSA children).
- Data analysis using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System.
Main Results:
- Compliance with audit criteria varied from 33% to 100%.
- Key areas for improvement identified: provision of prescribed enteral feed volumes and weekly patient weighing.
- The audit facilitated a standardized, multi-center evaluation of nutrition care.
Conclusions:
- Nutrition support delivery in burn patients requires ongoing clinical improvement in Australia and New Zealand.
- Clinical audit is essential for evaluating practice against evidence and ensuring quality care.
- The audit results have prompted a review of nutrition quality indicators in the Bi-National Burns Registry.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Burn Injuries
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
