Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

02:49
A Swine Burn Model for Investigating the Healing Process in Multiple Depth Burn Wounds
Published on: February 23, 2024
Determining the Value of Screening and Decolonization in Burn Unit Management
Chinaemelum C Akpunonu1, Yueran Zhang2, Jemima Carroll1
1Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Summary
Routine screening and decolonization for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in burn patients did not significantly reduce MRSA infections or length of stay. The study found no meaningful clinical advantage despite resource utilization.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Burn Care
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is linked to severe complications and poor outcomes in burn patients.
- Burn centers often use MRSA screening and decolonization to reduce transmission and infections.
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) implemented a two-phase quality improvement project for MRSA screening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of MRSA decolonization protocols on reducing MRSA incidence, length of stay (LOS), and wound infections in burn patients.
- To compare outcomes between a phase with MRSA decolonization and a phase without decolonization measures.
Main Methods:
- Phase 1 involved MRSA screening and decolonization (intranasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine baths) for positive patients.
- Phase 2 involved MRSA screening but no decolonization measures.
- Patient data on MRSA status, wound infections, LOS, and mortality were collected and analyzed across both phases.
Main Results:
- In Phase 1, 4 out of 45 patients developed MRSA wound infections. In Phase 2, 13 out of 103 patients developed non-MRSA wound infections.
- No significant differences were observed in length of stay, infection incidence (adjusted for TBSA), or mortality between the two phases.
- The study indicated that the costs and resources for screening and decolonization did not yield a substantial clinical benefit.
Conclusions:
- Routine MRSA decolonization protocols in burn patients may not offer significant clinical advantages in reducing MRSA infections or length of stay.
- Further research is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness and clinical utility of MRSA screening and decolonization in specific burn patient populations.
- The findings suggest a need to re-evaluate current MRSA management strategies in burn care settings.