Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026
06:48
Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
4.4K
Same spaces, different races: what can cafeteria seating patterns tell us about intergroup relations in middle
Leslie Echols1, Brett J Solomon2, Sandra Graham1
1Department of Education.
Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
|August 12, 2014
Summary
Middle school cafeterias show racial segregation in seating. Researchers found limited contact between Asian, White, and Latino students, with Latino students contributing least to overall segregation.
Area of Science:
- Social psychology
- Sociology
- Educational psychology
Background:
- Racial segregation in schools is a persistent issue impacting student interactions.
- Understanding intergroup relations in diverse school environments is crucial for fostering inclusivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine racial seating patterns in a diverse middle school cafeteria.
- To assess the effectiveness of exposure and entropy indices in measuring segregation.
Main Methods:
- Utilized two segregation indices: an established exposure index and a novel entropy index.
- Observed and analyzed seating patterns of ethnically diverse middle school students over two weeks.
- Calculated contact levels between Asian, White, and Latino student groups.
Main Results:
- Observed expected contact between Asian and White students.
- Found limited contact between Asian and Latino students, and between White and Latino students.
- Latino students, despite being the numerical majority, contributed least to overall cafeteria segregation.
Conclusions:
- Cafeteria seating patterns reveal significant racial segregation among middle school students.
- The entropy index offers a valuable new method for quantifying social segregation.
- Findings highlight the need for interventions to promote positive intergroup relations in schools.
Related Concept Videos
04:49Robbers Cave
13.5K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
13.5K
01:50Cross-Sectional Research
11.5K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.5K
02:01Group Design
9.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.3K
01:22Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity
426
Proximity plays a fundamental role in shaping interpersonal attraction by increasing opportunities for interaction and fostering familiarity. Research consistently demonstrates that individuals are more likely to form social bonds with those who are physically closer to them, whether in residential settings, workplaces, or educational institutions. This effect is largely driven by the increased frequency of encounters, which facilitates the development of friendships and romantic...
426
02:16Surveys
14.3K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.3K
01:31In- and Out-Groups
28.5K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
28.5K