Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

3.4K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.4K
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

69
Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
69
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

1.1K
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
1.1K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.3K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.3K
Metacognition01:26

Metacognition

1.1K
Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...
1.1K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.4K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Special Issue Introduction: Educational Applications of Cognitive Psychology.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

How note-taking and note-using affects the benefit of interleaving over blocking.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Metacognitive Management of Attention in Online Learning.

Journal of Intelligence·2024
Same author

Does Using None-of-the-Above (NOTA) Hurt Students' Confidence?

Journal of Intelligence·2023
Same author

Where and how to learn: The interactive benefits of contextual variation, restudying, and retrieval practice for learning.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2020
Same author

Improving conceptual learning via pretests.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2020
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning.

Jeri L Little1, Elizabeth Ligon Bjork

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA, jerilittle@gmail.com.

Memory & Cognition
|August 16, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Answering multiple-choice questions with competitive alternatives improves later test performance, even on related information. This occurs because challenging incorrect options strengthen retrieval of all associated information, aiding learning.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.1K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.1K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Learning Sciences

Background:

  • Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are common assessment tools.
  • The impact of competitive incorrect alternatives on learning is not fully understood.
  • Retrieval practice is a key mechanism for memory enhancement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if MCQs with competitive incorrect alternatives enhance learning of both tested and related information.
  • To test the hypothesis that processing competitive alternatives strengthens memory access for associated information.
  • To differentiate between general accessibility and specific retrieval benefits.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using multiple-choice questions.
  • Participants answered MCQs with either competitive or noncompetitive incorrect alternatives.
  • Later cued-recall tests assessed performance on previously tested and nontested information.
  • Analysis included comparing performance based on alternative type and feedback conditions.

Main Results:

  • Enhanced recall for nontested information when answers previously appeared as competitive incorrect alternatives.
  • No performance enhancement when answers appeared as noncompetitive incorrect alternatives.
  • Competitive alternatives did not increase intrusions, ruling out general accessibility as the explanation.

Conclusions:

  • Competitive MCQs promote deeper information processing and retrieval.
  • This process strengthens memory for both correct and incorrect associated information.
  • MCQs can be powerful learning tools when designed with effective distractors.