Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioreactor Controls-II01:18

Bioreactor Controls-II

73
In aerobic fermentations, oxygen is vital for microbial growth and metabolite production. Since air comprises only about 20% oxygen and the gas is poorly soluble in water—just 9 ppm at 20°C—supplying sufficient oxygen becomes a critical challenge, especially in high-demand processes like yeast growth or citric acid production. Even a fully saturated broth may offer only a few seconds of oxygen availability.To address this, sterile or scrubbed air is introduced into the...
73
Bioreactor Controls-I01:28

Bioreactor Controls-I

92
Maintaining optimal conditions within fermenters is essential for maximizing microbial productivity and ensuring process efficiency. This lesson focuses on key parameters—temperature, foam, pH, carbon dioxide, oxygen, and pressure—and their precise measurement and control strategies in fermentation systems.Temperature ControlTemperature regulation is critical due to the exothermic nature of many fermentation processes. In small laboratory fermenters, temperature is commonly...
92
Bioreactor Design and Operational System01:29

Bioreactor Design and Operational System

191
Bioreactors are engineered vessels designed to cultivate microorganisms under controlled conditions for industrial bioprocessing. They maintain sterility and allow precise regulation of pH, temperature, oxygen, and nutrient levels to optimize microbial growth and metabolite production. Bioreactors range from small laboratory units of 1 liter to industrial systems holding up to 500,000 liters, though only about 75% of their volume is actively used for fermentation. The remaining headspace...
191

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Gas-resolved energy partitioning in a high-frequency sonoreactor: decoupling cavitation-driven reactivity from non-cavitational dissipation.

Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2026
Same author

Multidimensional Analysis of Chlorine Photolysis for Astrazon Red 6B Degradation: Kinetics, Synergistic Effects, and Mechanistic Insights.

Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation·2026
Same author

Acoustic Cavitation-Driven Extraction of Ginger Phytochemicals: Modeling, Optimization and Bioactivity Evaluation.

Journal of food science·2026
Same author

Review of ultrasonication-assisted Fenton processes for degrading aqueous pollutants.

Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2025
Same author

Special issue on "Ultrasound-assisted separation processes".

Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2025
Same author

A novel ultrasonic field-focusing nozzle for enhanced sonochemical reactor performance.

Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Activating Molecules, Ions, and Solid Particles with Acoustic Cavitation
14:22

Activating Molecules, Ions, and Solid Particles with Acoustic Cavitation

Published on: April 11, 2014

14.7K

A method for predicting the number of active bubbles in sonochemical reactors.

Slimane Merouani1, Hamza Ferkous2, Oualid Hamdaoui2

  • 1Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Department of Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Badji Mokhtar - Annaba University, P.O. Box 12, 23000 Annaba, Algeria; Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Engineering Process, University of Constantine 3, Constantine, Algeria.

Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
|August 16, 2014
PubMed
Summary

A new semi-empirical method estimates active bubbles in acoustic cavitation fields. Higher ultrasonic frequencies significantly increase the number of bubbles formed, aiding ultrasonic reactor performance prediction.

Keywords:
Bubble dynamicsChemical kineticsNumber of bubblesSonochemistryUltrasonic frequencyUltrasonic reactors

More Related Videos

Microalgae Cultivation and Biomass Quantification in a Bench-Scale Photobioreactor with Corrosive Flue Gases
08:41

Microalgae Cultivation and Biomass Quantification in a Bench-Scale Photobioreactor with Corrosive Flue Gases

Published on: December 19, 2019

9.8K
Fabricating and Labeling Microbubbles with Fluorescent and Radioactive Tracers
10:40

Fabricating and Labeling Microbubbles with Fluorescent and Radioactive Tracers

Published on: January 24, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Activating Molecules, Ions, and Solid Particles with Acoustic Cavitation
14:22

Activating Molecules, Ions, and Solid Particles with Acoustic Cavitation

Published on: April 11, 2014

14.7K
Microalgae Cultivation and Biomass Quantification in a Bench-Scale Photobioreactor with Corrosive Flue Gases
08:41

Microalgae Cultivation and Biomass Quantification in a Bench-Scale Photobioreactor with Corrosive Flue Gases

Published on: December 19, 2019

9.8K
Fabricating and Labeling Microbubbles with Fluorescent and Radioactive Tracers
10:40

Fabricating and Labeling Microbubbles with Fluorescent and Radioactive Tracers

Published on: January 24, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Acoustics
  • Physical Chemistry
  • Chemical Engineering

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of ultrasonic reactor performance relies on understanding active bubble dynamics in acoustic cavitation fields.
  • Existing literature on quantifying active bubbles is limited due to the phenomenon's complexity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a straightforward semi-empirical method for predicting the number of active bubbles in acoustic cavitation.
  • To correlate bubble dynamics with chemical kinetics for estimating radical and molecular species released per bubble.

Main Methods:

  • Coupling bubble dynamics in acoustic fields with intra-bubble chemical kinetics.
  • Estimating hydroxyl (OH), perhydroxyl (HO2) radicals, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) released by single bubbles.
  • Utilizing material balances for H2O2, OH, and HO2 to determine bubble generation rate, assuming transient cavitation and bubble fragmentation.

Main Results:

  • A novel semi-empirical method was developed to predict active bubble counts in acoustic cavitation.
  • The method successfully estimated radical and molecular species released from individual oscillating bubbles.
  • Increasing ultrasonic frequency was demonstrated to substantially elevate the number of active bubbles generated.

Conclusions:

  • The developed method offers a simplified approach to quantifying active bubbles in sonochemical applications.
  • Understanding active bubble formation is crucial for optimizing ultrasonic reactor efficiency.
  • Ultrasonic frequency is a key parameter influencing bubble generation and, consequently, reactor performance.