Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference
Published on: September 5, 2019
The third-order algebraic diagrammatic construction method (ADC(3)) for the polarization propagator for closed-shell
Philipp H P Harbach1, Michael Wormit1, Andreas Dreuw1
1Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computation, Ruprecht-Karls University, In Neuenheimer Feld 368, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
The algebraic diagrammatic construction (ADC) method, specifically ADC(3), efficiently computes excited states in molecules. ADC(3) shows high accuracy comparable to CC3, with broader applicability due to better scaling.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry
- Quantum Chemistry
- Theoretical Chemistry
Background:
- Accurate computation of molecular excited states is crucial for understanding photophysical and photochemical processes.
- Perturbation theory methods, such as algebraic diagrammatic construction (ADC), offer a balance between accuracy and computational cost.
- Previous studies have established benchmark datasets for evaluating the performance of quantum chemical methods for excitation energies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report an efficient implementation of the algebraic diagrammatic construction method in third-order perturbation theory (ADC(3)) for calculating excited states.
- To assess the accuracy of ADC(2) and ADC(3) methods by comparing their results with a recently established benchmark set.
- To compare the performance of ADC(3) with the coupled cluster singles and doubles in triples (CC3) method.
Main Methods:
- Implementation of an efficient computational program for the ADC(3) method.
- Calculation of vertical excited singlet and triplet states for 28 organic molecules.
- Comparison of calculated excitation energies and oscillator strengths with Thiel's benchmark dataset and CC3 results.
Main Results:
- ADC(3) demonstrated high accuracy with mean errors of 0.12 ± 0.28 eV (singlets) and -0.18 ± 0.16 eV (triplets) against theoretical best estimates.
- ADC(2) variants showed varying accuracies, with ADC(2)-x performing better than ADC(2)-s for triplet states.
- Comparison with CC3 indicated comparable accuracy for ADC(3), with ADC(3) exhibiting slightly better performance for singlet states (0.08 ± 0.27 eV vs 0.23 ± 0.21 eV).
Conclusions:
- The ADC(3) method provides a highly accurate and efficient approach for computing excited states in organic molecules.
- ADC(3) demonstrates a performance comparable to the more computationally expensive CC3 method.
- ADC(3) possesses a significantly larger range of applicability due to its favorable O(N^6) scaling with system size, making it suitable for larger molecular systems.
More Related Videos
05:54Author Spotlight: Non-Invasive Imaging of Complex Bio-Structures Using Polarization-Sensitive Two-Photon Microscopy
Published on: September 8, 2023
09:00Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
Published on: June 28, 2018
Related Concept Videos
MO Theory and Covalent Bonding
Hückel's Rule Diagram of π MOs: Frost Circle
A Frost circle is constructed by drawing a polygon whose number of edges is equal to the number of carbons of the given cyclic system, with one of the vertices pointing down. Then, a circle is drawn enclosing the polygon so...
Molecular Orbital Theory II
Molecular Orbital Theory I
Potential Due to a Polarized Object
Graphs of Polar Equations