Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Mitigating Glycemic Disparities: Understanding Contributions of Sociodemographic Variables in the Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Glycemia (4T) Study.

The Journal of pediatrics·2026

Same author

Micro-randomization trial design under operational constraints.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026

Same author

Pilot proteomics study for identifying a pollution exposure signature in firefighters.

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology·2026

Same author

From tool to teammate in a randomized controlled trial of clinician-AI collaborative workflows for diagnosis.

NPJ digital medicine·2026

Same author

Genotype-Phenotype Correlation Through Breakpoint Characterization of a Genomically Balanced Complex Chromosomal Rearrangement Using Long Read Sequencing.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2026

Same author

High Stakes, High Dose? Retrospective Treatment Outcomes of Coccidioidal Meningitis Treated With Steroids.

The Neurohospitalist·2026

Same journal

Antithrombotic Management in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome Receiving Oral Anticoagulation.

Current cardiology reports·2026

Same journal

Transcriptome Reprogramming in Heart Failure: The Hidden Splicing Code.

Current cardiology reports·2026

Same journal

Diagnosis and Management of Loeys-Dietz Syndrome: Evidence Gaps and Future Directions.

Current cardiology reports·2026

Same journal

Correction: Heart Disease in Older Women: Unique Challenges in Diagnosis and Management.

Current cardiology reports·2026

Same journal

Beyond the ICD: Navigating Ventricular Tachycardia Suppression Strategies in the Modern Era.

Current cardiology reports·2026

Same journal

Updates on Pathophysiology of Pericarditis to Guide Development of Therapeutics.

Current cardiology reports·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Challenges and solutions to pre- and post-randomization subgroup analyses.

Manisha Desai¹, Karen S Pieper, Ken Mahaffey

¹Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, 1070 Arastradero Road #305, Palo Alto, CA, 94306, USA, manishad@stanford.edu.

Current Cardiology Reports

|August 20, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Subgroup analyses in clinical trials can identify treatment effects across patient groups. However, post-randomization analyses risk biased results, necessitating careful guidelines for reliable interpretation.

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Area of Science:

Clinical Trials
Biostatistics
Medical Research

Background:

Subgroup analyses are common in clinical trials to assess treatment consistency or target specific patient characteristics.
Statistical challenges exist for subgroup analyses, particularly those defined by pre-randomization features.
Post-randomization subgroup analyses, including complier average causal effect (CACE) estimations, are frequently performed but less discussed in literature.

Purpose of the Study:

To summarize statistical challenges associated with all types of subgroup analyses.
To highlight the specific issues and risks of bias in post-randomization subgroup analyses.
To provide guidelines for conducting subgroup analyses across the spectrum of clinical trial designs.

Main Methods:

Literature review and synthesis of statistical challenges in subgroup analysis.
Emphasis on the methodological considerations for post-randomization subgroup analyses.
Development of practical guidelines for researchers performing subgroup analyses.

Main Results:

Pre-randomization subgroup analyses have well-documented statistical issues.
Post-randomization subgroup analyses present a high risk of biased treatment effect descriptions.
Neglect in the literature regarding the statistical complexities of post-randomization subgroup analyses.

Conclusions:

Subgroup analyses require careful statistical consideration, especially when defined by post-randomization features.
Awareness of potential biases in post-randomization subgroup analyses is crucial for accurate interpretation.
Adherence to established guidelines is recommended for robust subgroup analysis in clinical trials.