Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Glycemic Impact on Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms on Physical, Radiographic, and Inflammatory Markers among Individuals Aged 50 and Over with Diabetes
Published on: March 7, 2025
Mitigating Glycemic Disparities: Understanding Contributions of Sociodemographic Variables in the Teamwork, Targets,
Ananta Addala1, Victor Ritter2, Blake Shaw2
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Insights
Early continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) improved glycemic outcomes and reduced disparities. The Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Glycemia (4T) program showed effectiveness in addressing sociodemographic barriers.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Diabetes Technology
- Health Equity
Background:
- Type 1 diabetes (T1D) management in youth requires addressing sociodemographic factors to reduce health disparities.
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) offers potential for improved glycemic control but access and support vary.
- The Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Glycemia (4T) program was designed to integrate CGM with support for new-onset T1D.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if early CGM initiation with programmatic support in youth with T1D reduces glycemic disparities.
- To assess the impact of the 4T program on Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels across different sociodemographic groups.
- To identify key factors contributing to glycemic variability in pediatric T1D.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving new-onset T1D youth initiated on CGM within one month of diagnosis.
- Evaluation of HbA1c levels at 12 months, stratified by race/ethnicity, insurance, deprivation, and language.
- Comparison of outcomes across three cohorts: historical, pilot, and study 1, spanning from 2014 to 2022.
Main Results:
- In study 1, HbA1c levels were lowest among non-Hispanic White youth, those with low deprivation, private insurance, and English preference.
- Disparities in HbA1c by ethnicity and insurance were attenuated in study 1 compared to historical cohorts.
- Socioeconomic deprivation and race/ethnicity were the largest contributors to HbA1c variability (41.3% and 32.2%, respectively).
Conclusions:
- The 4T program, incorporating early CGM and support, improved glycemic outcomes and reduced disparities, particularly by insurance and ethnicity.
- Socioeconomic deprivation emerged as a significant factor influencing HbA1c variability and a target for future interventions.
- The 4T program demonstrates potential as an effective, equity-oriented model for managing pediatric T1D.
Objective:
To assess, in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D), whether the initiation of early continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with programmatic support to address sociodemographic barriers is associated with reduced disparities and improved glycemia.
Study Design:
CGM was initiated <1 month postdiagnosis with remote monitoring and <7% glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) target in youth with new-onset T1D in the Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Glycemia program. We evaluated HbA1c stratified by race and ethnicity, insurance, deprivation, and language across 3 cohorts: historical (June 2014 to December 2016), pilot (July 2018 to June 2020), and study 1 (June 2020 to March 2022).
Results:
At 12 months in study 1, HbA1c was lowest among non-Hispanic White (6.5%; 95% CI 6.2%-6.9%), low deprivation (6.5%; 95% CI 6.2%-6.9%), private insurance (6.6%; 95% CI 6.3%-7%), and English preference (6.7%; 95% CI 6.4%-7%). HbA1c disparities were attenuated in study 1: ethnicity slopes changed from historical (0.09; 95% CI -0.02 to 0.20) to pilot (0.14; 95% CI -0.04 to 0.31) to study 1 (0.08; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.23). Insurance slopes improved from historical (0.20; 95% CI 0.09-0.31) to pilot (0.12; 95% CI -0.06 to 0.29) to study 1 (0.01; 95%CI -0.14 to 0.16). Deprivation (41.3%) and race and ethnicity (32.2%) contributed most to HbA1c variability.
Conclusions:
Study 1 was associated with improved glycemic outcomes and attenuation of some disparities, particularly by insurance and ethnicity, supporting the Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Glycemia program as an effective equity-oriented care model. Deprivation emerged as a key model-derived contributor to variability in HbA1c and may represent an important target to reduce disparities in pediatric T1D glycemia.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Type II Diabetes I: Introduction
Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...