Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microbial Biosensors01:17

Microbial Biosensors

88
Microbial biosensors are analytical devices that utilize living microbes to detect specific substances through measurable signals. These devices consist of two main components: biosensing organisms and signal-transducing elements. Biosensing organisms, such as Escherichia coli or Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are typically housed in multiwell plates connected to transducers, enabling rapid, real-time detection of target analytes.Signal Generation MechanismWhen a target analyte—such as...
88

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detecting directed motion and confinement in single-particle trajectories using hidden variables.

eLife·2026
Same author

Space and wavelength multiplexing of holographic fields in longitudinal and transverse planes using waveguide metasurfaces.

Optics express·2026
Same author

Innovation Headroom for a Highly Accurate PD-L1 Companion Diagnostic in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

PharmacoEconomics·2025
Same author

Diffusion Coefficients of Coated Plasmonic Nanoparticles in Viscous Environment.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2024
Same author

Multiplexed immunolabelling of cancer using bioconjugated plasmonic gold-silver alloy nanoparticles.

Nanoscale advances·2024
Same author

Deep learning-assisted light sheet holography.

Optics express·2024
Same journal

Generalizable framework for multi-site bone density prediction using non-dominant wrist optical biomarkers.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same journal

Erratum: Review of dynamic optical coherence tomography for intracellular motility [Invited]: errata.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same journal

Digital-micromirror-device-based illumination strategies for background suppression in single-molecule localization microscopy.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same journal

Synergistic combination of convective self-assembly and hollow core fiber for sensitive SERS detection of glucose molecules.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same journal

Multimodal diagnostic network integrating infrared and mass spectra for lung cancer.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same journal

Multimodal Optical Biosensing for Precision Medicine and Healthcare: Introduction to the feature issue.

Biomedical optics express·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

A Label-free Technique for the Spatio-temporal Imaging of Single Cell Secretions
09:09

A Label-free Technique for the Spatio-temporal Imaging of Single Cell Secretions

Published on: November 23, 2015

8.3K

Self-referenced spectroscopy using plasmon waveguide resonance biosensor.

Farshid Bahrami1, Mathieu Maisonneuve2, Michel Meunier2

  • 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G4, Canada.

Biomedical Optics Express
|August 20, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A novel plasmon waveguide resonance (PWR) sensor offers self-referenced biosensing by utilizing TM and TE polarizations. This allows accurate measurement of surface changes, unaffected by background refractive index variations.

Keywords:
(250.5403) Plasmonics(280.4788) Optical sensing and sensors

More Related Videos

Use of Label-free Optical Biosensors to Detect Modulation of Potassium Channels by G-protein Coupled Receptors
10:59

Use of Label-free Optical Biosensors to Detect Modulation of Potassium Channels by G-protein Coupled Receptors

Published on: February 10, 2014

9.5K
Attaching Biological Probes to Silica Optical Biosensors Using Silane Coupling Agents
09:35

Attaching Biological Probes to Silica Optical Biosensors Using Silane Coupling Agents

Published on: May 1, 2012

12.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

A Label-free Technique for the Spatio-temporal Imaging of Single Cell Secretions
09:09

A Label-free Technique for the Spatio-temporal Imaging of Single Cell Secretions

Published on: November 23, 2015

8.3K
Use of Label-free Optical Biosensors to Detect Modulation of Potassium Channels by G-protein Coupled Receptors
10:59

Use of Label-free Optical Biosensors to Detect Modulation of Potassium Channels by G-protein Coupled Receptors

Published on: February 10, 2014

9.5K
Attaching Biological Probes to Silica Optical Biosensors Using Silane Coupling Agents
09:35

Attaching Biological Probes to Silica Optical Biosensors Using Silane Coupling Agents

Published on: May 1, 2012

12.7K

Area of Science:

  • Plasmonics
  • Nanophotonics
  • Biosensing

Background:

  • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors are widely used for biosensing.
  • Conventional SPR sensors are sensitive to both surface binding events and bulk refractive index changes.
  • Decoupling these effects is crucial for accurate and reliable biosensing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To design, fabricate, and test a plasmon waveguide resonance (PWR) sensor for self-referenced biosensing.
  • To demonstrate the ability of the PWR sensor to distinguish between bulk effects and surface effects.
  • To benchmark the performance of the PWR sensor against a conventional SPR sensor.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing a plasmon waveguide resonance (PWR) sensor capable of supporting both TM and TE polarizations.
  • Employing multimode spectroscopy to analyze the distinct sensitivities of TM and TE modes.
  • Fabricating and testing a conventional surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor under identical conditions for comparison.

Main Results:

  • The PWR sensor successfully supports both TM and TE polarizations.
  • TM polarization exhibits high sensitivity to background refractive index variations (bulk effects).
  • TE polarization shows greater sensitivity to adlayer thickness changes (surface effects).
  • Simultaneous operation in both modes allows for decoupling of bulk and surface effects.

Conclusions:

  • The developed PWR sensor enables self-referenced biosensing by effectively separating bulk and surface effects.
  • This approach enhances the accuracy and reliability of biosensing measurements.
  • The PWR sensor demonstrates comparable or superior performance to conventional SPR sensors.