Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion PHP with Melphalan as a Treatment for Unresectable Metastases Confined to the Liver
Published on: July 31, 2016
Palliative treatment for symptomatic malignant pericardial effusion†
Guled M Jama1, Marco Scarci2, Jack Bowden3
1Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research (CIMR), Wellcome Trust/MRC Building, Cambridge, UK Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK gmj30@cam.ac.uk.
Surgical pericardial effusion drainage offers superior symptom relief and lower recurrence rates compared to non-surgical methods in cancer patients. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and address selection bias.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
Background:
- Malignant pericardial effusion management lacks a consensus on optimal therapy.
- Pericardial effusion in cancer patients presents significant clinical challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of surgical versus non-surgical treatments for malignant pericardial effusion.
- To synthesize existing evidence on intervention success, recurrence, and complications.
Main Methods:
- A formal literature search identified studies on pericardial effusion treatment in cancer patients.
- Quantitative synthesis of data from 59 selected articles involving 1399 patients.
- Data extraction focused on intervention type, success rates, recurrence, and complications.
Main Results:
- Surgical approaches (19 studies) showed high success rates (93.3-100%) with lower complication rates (4.5-10.3%).
- Non-surgical modalities (40 studies) had variable success rates (55.1-90.4%) but higher complication rates (5.9-32%).
- Surgical drainage demonstrated superiority in symptom relief, effusion recurrence, and morbidity.
Conclusions:
- Surgical pericardial effusion drainage appears more effective than non-surgical options.
- Lack of randomized controlled trials limits definitive conclusions due to potential selection bias.
- High-quality, controlled trials are a priority for establishing definitive treatment guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Myocarditis III: Medical Management

