Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

2.5K
2.5K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

7.5K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
7.5K
Evolution of Microbial Genome01:08

Evolution of Microbial Genome

89
Microbial genome evolution is a highly dynamic process shaped by continual gene gain and loss across species and strains. This genomic flexibility allows microorganisms to adapt rapidly to environmental pressures and interactions with other organisms. Central to understanding this diversity is the distinction between the core and pan genomes.The core genome comprises the genes shared by all sampled strains of a species, representing essential functions needed for fundamental cellular processes.
89
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

5.8K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
5.8K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

6.2K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
6.2K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

2.5K
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First-principles modeling of polysilazane-derived SiCNH ceramics: insights into the organization of the free-carbon phase.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same author

THE SOCIETY OF CRITICAL CARE CARDIOLOGY - RATIONALE, BLUEPRINT, AND LESSONS LEARNED IN THE CREATION OF A NEW MULTIDISCIPLINARY PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION.

American heart journal·2026
Same author

A host defense role for Fibrinogen by direct binding of Clostridium botulinum C2 toxin.

Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS·2026
Same author

Multiscale modeling of the spatial structure of stem cells in neuroblastoma patient-derived tumoroids reveals a critical role for a short-range diffusive process.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Structural Mutations Set an Equilibrium Noncoding Genome Fraction.

Molecular biology and evolution·2025
Same author

State-of-the-Art in Echocardiographic Strain Imaging of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy.

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography·2025
Same journal

Effects of Seasonal Births and Predation on Disease Spread.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Identifiability, Sensitivity, and Genetic Algorithms in Bacterial Biofilm Selection Models.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Slow Evolution Towards Generalism in a Model of Variable Dietary Range.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

CBINN: Cancer Biology-Informed Neural Network for Unknown Parameter Estimation and Missing Physics Identification.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

A Cost-Sensitive Behavioral Modeling Analysis of the Early Identification and Control of Infectious Diseases.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Tracking Dynamics of Superspreading Through Contacts, Exposures, and Transmissions in Edge-Based Network Epidemics.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.2K

A model for genome size evolution.

Stephan Fischer1, Samuel Bernard, Guillaume Beslon

  • 1INSA-Lyon, Inria, CNRS, LIRIS, UMR5205, 69621, Villeurbanne, France, stephan.fischer@insa-lyon.fr.

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
|August 22, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Genome size evolution is constrained by mutation dynamics. Our model shows genomes naturally avoid infinite growth due to spontaneous mutation processes, even with biased duplication rates.

More Related Videos

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

5.1K
Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.2K
Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

5.1K
Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Genomics
  • Theoretical biology

Background:

  • Genome size evolution is influenced by various mutation types, including small insertions/deletions and large chromosomal rearrangements.
  • Understanding the interplay of these mutations is crucial for predicting genome size dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a minimalist model for genome size evolution incorporating diverse mutation types.
  • To investigate the spontaneous dynamics of genome size in the absence of selection.
  • To determine the conditions for genome size stability and establish bounds on its distribution.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a mathematical model for genome size evolution.
  • Inclusion of local mutations (small insertions/deletions) and large chromosomal rearrangements (duplications/large deletions).
  • Analysis of mutation rates, mean sizes, and their impact on stationary distributions.

Main Results:

  • In the absence of selection, genomes tend to remain below a finite size, irrespective of duplication rates or insertion/deletion biases.
  • The existence of a stable genome size distribution depends non-trivially on mutation parameters.
  • A shrinkage bias in genome size emerges rapidly, even with symmetrical DNA gains and losses.

Conclusions:

  • Spontaneous mutation dynamics inherently limit genome size, preventing infinite growth.
  • Selection acting on genome size operates within stability-related limits imposed by mutation processes.
  • The model provides a foundational understanding of genome size regulation through mutation-driven forces.