Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Probability Histograms01:17

Probability Histograms

8.7K
A probability histogram is a visual representation of a probability distribution. Similar a typical histogram, the probability histogram consists of contiguous (adjoining) boxes. It has both a horizontal axis and a vertical axis. The horizontal axis is labeled with what the data represents. The vertical axis is labeled with probability. Each rectangular bar in the histogram is 1 unit wide, which suggests that the area under each bar equals the probability, P(x), where x is 1, 2, 3, and so on.
8.7K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.5K
Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

13.1K
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
13.1K
Bootstrapping01:24

Bootstrapping

784
The term "bootstrap" originated in the 19th century as a metaphor for self-improvement or achieving something independently, without external assistance. This concept extends to statistical bootstrapping, a self-contained method for estimating population parameters through resampling, even though it can be computationally intensive. Developed by the American statistician Dr. Bradley Efron in 1979, bootstrapping provides a robust way to perform inference when the original sample size is...
784
Probability Distributions01:32

Probability Distributions

10.0K
 The probability of a random variable x  is the likelihood of its occurrence. A probability distribution represents the probabilities of a random variable using a formula, graph, or table. There are two types of probability distribution– discrete probability distribution and continuous probability distribution.
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson...
10.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human Rationality.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same author

Capturing Argument in Agent-Based Models.

Topoi : an international review of philosophy·2025
Same author

The Limited Place in Cognitive Space.

Topics in cognitive science·2025
Same author

A Defined Diet Combined with Sonicated Inoculum Provides a High Incidence, Moderate Severity Form of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE).

ACS pharmacology & translational science·2024
Same author

Learning from conditional probabilities.

Cognition·2024
Same author

How large language models can reshape collective intelligence.

Nature human behaviour·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

10.6K

The Bayesian boom: good thing or bad?

Ulrike Hahn1

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, Centre for Cognition, Computation, and Modelling, Birkbeck, University of London London, UK.

Frontiers in Psychology
|August 26, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian models of cognition are defended against critiques by examining specific applications. Rationality considerations uniquely benefit cognitive science theory and practice.

Keywords:
Bayesian modelingnormativityprobabilityrationality

More Related Videos

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.9K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

10.6K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.9K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Philosophy of Mind

Background:

  • Recent critiques question the role of rational, normative principles in Bayesian models of cognition.
  • These critiques challenge the fundamental contributions of rationality to understanding cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate central claims from critiques of Bayesian cognitive models.
  • To demonstrate how specific examples of Bayesian modeling address these critiques.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of specific Bayesian models applied to diverse cognitive phenomena.
  • Directly confronting critiques with empirical and theoretical examples from cognitive modeling.

Main Results:

  • Critiques of Bayesian cognitive models are shown to be unsustainable across various applications.
  • The perceived deficits in Bayesian models do not stem from the framework itself but from the level of analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian cognitive modeling remains a valuable framework when analyzed at the appropriate level.
  • Incorporating rationality considerations offers unique benefits to cognitive science research and application.