Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
Published on: October 10, 2025
Reduction of preanalytical errors in clinical laboratory through multiple aspects and whole course intervention
Hong-ying Li1, Xiang-ning Huang, Yong-chang Yang
1Medical Records Department, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan, China.
Objective:
Errors in preanalytical phase decrease the accuracy of reports from clinical laboratory department. Considering the disqualified rate of preanalytical sample in our hospital, we performed several intervention measures to improve the situation.
Methods:
The disqualified sample types and major causes of errors in the preanalytical phase were investigated in clinical laboratory department from September 2008 to August 2009. In the following year, we utilized multiple measures to properly intervene the key points of whole sample collection process, and the preanalytical errors were reanalyzed trimonthly, then the disqualification rate of total, major disqualified sample types and different test groups were calculated to evaluate the effects of the intervention measures.
Results:
The total disqualification rate in the preanalytical phase obtained from September 2008 to August 2009 was 1.36%, and the major types of disqualified samples were coagulation of anticoagulant sample, sample inadequacy, sample container error, sample information error and sample type error. After one year intervention through key points of whole preanalytical sample collection process, the total disqualification rate dropped to 0.94%, and the disqualification rate of coagulation of anticoagulant sample, sample inadequacy, sample container error, sample information error, and sample type error decreased by 20.45%, 28.00%, 25.00%, 76.92%, and 66.66%, respectively. As for test groups, the decreasing amplitude of biochemical, routine, immunological, microbiological and emergency test group was 47.36%, 33.33%, 20.00%, 50.00%, and 21.43%, respectively.
Conclusions:
The overall effect of the interventions is very good, and the disqualification rate of the main causes decreases to various degrees.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Blank Solutions
In some experimental cases, the reagents, solvents, or lab equipment used in...

