Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Diagnosis of Neoplasia in Barrett’s Esophagus using Vital-dye Enhanced Fluorescence Imaging
Published on: May 11, 2014
Standardised reporting protocol for endoscopic resection for Barrett oesophagus associated neoplasia: expert
M P Kumarasinghe1, I Brown, S Raftopoulos
11PathWest, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, and University of Western Australia, WA 2Envoi Pathology, Herston, Qld 3Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA 4Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, and Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 5Department of Histopathology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW 6Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW 7St John of God Hospital Murdoch, Murdoch, and Department of Surgery, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, WA 8Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, University of Sydney, NSW 9Griffith Medical School and Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Qld 10Department of Medical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia 11St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada 12Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
None:
Endoscopic resection (ER) is considered the therapy of choice for intraepithelial neoplasia associated with visible lesions and T1a adenocarcinoma. Pathologists are bound to encounter specimens collected via these techniques more frequently in their practice. A standardised protocol for handling, grossing, and assessing ER specimens should be adopted to ensure that all prognostic information and characteristics influencing treatment are included in reports (see Supplementary Video Abstract, http://links.lww.com/PAT/A22). The entire specimen should be appropriately oriented, processed and assessed. An ER specimen will commonly show intraepithelial neoplasia or invasive carcinoma. There are essential features that should be recorded if invasive carcinoma is found as they dictate further management and follow-up. These features are the margin status, depth of invasion, degree of differentiation and presence or absence of lymphovascular invasion. Important features such as duplication of muscularis mucosae should be recognised to avoid misinterpretation of depth of invasion. Key diagnostic and prognostic elements that are essential for optimal clinical decisions have been included in the reporting format proposed by the Structured Pathology Reporting committee of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

