Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

17.9K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
17.9K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

431
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
431
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy01:24

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

786
Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) are grounded in the belief that our thoughts profoundly influence our emotions and actions. Advocates of CBT emphasize three core assumptions: first, that cognitions are identifiable and measurable; second, that they are central to psychological functioning; and third, that irrational or maladaptive beliefs can be replaced with rational and adaptive ones. This transformative approach to therapy has paved the way for specific models such as Albert...
786
Introspection01:29

Introspection

436
Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...
436

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A caveat regarding the unfolding argument: implications of plasticity.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same author

Factors that influence the amplitude of the bereitschaftspotential.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

On a confusion about there being two types of consciousness.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025
Same author

Self-initiated action rescues visual targets from backwards masking.

iScience·2025
Same author

The Experience of Deciding: An Electroencephalography Study.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Probing for intentions: The early readiness potential does not reflect awareness of motor preparation.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same journal

On the clinical anatomy of technological cognition.

Cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Increasing statistical power in functional MRI through permutation and multivariate statistics.

Cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

fMRI research: do we need statistically better studies, larger studies, or no more studies?

Cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Catching the drift: EEG microstate dynamics resemble time-on-task changes in mind wandering and sustained attention.

Cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Toward a cognitive neuroscience of technology.

Cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

What behavioral relevance is (not).

Cognitive neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.4K

Intentions and voluntary actions: reframing the problem.

Aaron Schurger1

  • 1a Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences , Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne , Lausanne , Switzerland.

Cognitive Neuroscience
|August 28, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific arguments need clear conceptual analysis to avoid hidden assumptions. While technical rigor is important, conceptual clarity is crucial for robust scientific reasoning and avoiding research pitfalls.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.2K
Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

24.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.4K
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.2K
Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

24.7K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Scientific Methodology

Background:

  • Conceptual clarity and coherence are often undervalued in scientific research, overshadowed by technical sophistication.
  • The effectiveness of conceptual analysis in proactively preventing research pitfalls is questioned.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the role of conceptual analysis in scientific reasoning.
  • To advocate for methods that formalize scientific arguments and reveal implicit assumptions.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the limitations of current scientific practices.
  • Highlighting the need for structured approaches to argument formulation.

Main Results:

  • Conceptual analysis alone may not prevent pitfalls but can expose them.
  • Existing tools for formalizing arguments and assumptions are underutilized.

Conclusions:

  • A formulaic approach to scientific arguments is necessary.
  • Emphasizing the importance of making implicit assumptions explicit through systematic methods.