Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

1.7K
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
1.7K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

17.9K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
17.9K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

5.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
5.9K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

6.7K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
6.7K
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

29.1K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
29.1K
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

431
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
431

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fake publications in biomedical science: red-flagging method indicates mass production.

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology·2025
Same author

The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Is Ockham's razor losing its edge? New perspectives on the principle of model parsimony.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Alternative models of funding curiosity-driven research.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Uncertainty about paternity: a study on deliberate ignorance.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same author

The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same journal

An Introduction to Rational Constructivism in Cognitive Development.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Fungal Memory and Minimal Cognition.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Limits to Language Prediction: Findings From Diverse Populations.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

There Is More Than Meets the Eye: The Dual Role of Perception in Shaping Color Lexicons.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Inference and Imagination.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Gesture Use Across Different Concepts: Focusing on Cross-Linguistic Diversity.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K

Moral satisficing: rethinking moral behavior as bounded rationality.

Gerd Gigerenzer1

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin.

Topics in Cognitive Science
|August 29, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Moral behavior arises from the interaction between the mind and environment, not just character or reason. This perspective emphasizes pragmatic social heuristics over strict moral rules for understanding and influencing ethical actions.

Keywords:
Bounded rationalityMoral behaviorSocial heuristics

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

5.7K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

5.7K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Moral Psychology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Traditional views of moral behavior often focus on character traits or rational deliberation.
  • Bounded rationality offers an alternative framework, emphasizing cognitive limitations and environmental influences.
  • Understanding the drivers of moral decision-making is crucial for both theoretical and applied contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the nature of moral behavior through the lens of bounded rationality.
  • To propose that moral actions stem from the interplay between cognitive processes and environmental contexts.
  • To challenge the notion that moral behavior is solely dictated by internal traits or abstract rules.

Main Methods:

  • The study integrates concepts from bounded rationality and social heuristics.
  • It advocates for a methodological shift towards studying behavior in naturalistic and social settings.
  • Analysis considers the context-dependent nature of social heuristics.

Main Results:

  • Moral behavior emerges from the dynamic interaction of an individual's mind and their surrounding environment.
  • Pragmatic social heuristics, rather than absolute moral rules, are identified as the basis for moral actions.
  • The effectiveness of these heuristics is contingent upon the specific environmental context.

Conclusions:

  • Moral behavior is a function of both internal cognitive mechanisms and external environmental structures.
  • Future research should investigate moral behavior in diverse social and ecological settings.
  • Effective moral policy requires acknowledging the environmental dependence of behavior to develop realistic interventions.