Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
Published on: November 17, 2023
Q-Probes studies in anatomic pathology: quality improvement through targeted benchmarking
Joseph A Tworek1, Keith E Volmar, Shannon J McCall
1From the Department of Pathology, St Joseph Mercy Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Dr Tworek); the Department of Pathology, Rex Healthcare, Raleigh, North Carolina (Dr Volmar); the Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina (Dr McCall); the Surveys Department, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Ms Bashleben); and the Department of Pathology, State University of New York Downstate, Brooklyn (Dr Howanitz).
The Q-Probes program, launched in 1989 by the College of American Pathologists, provides a peer-comparison quality assurance service for anatomic pathology. It generates national benchmarks for specific quality metrics in cytopathology, surgical pathology, and autopsy pathology. The program uses a voluntary subscription model, with data collected from laboratories in 19 countries. Fifty-two anatomic pathology Q-Probes studies have been conducted, with one-third focusing on AP metrics. These studies have provided the first standardized national benchmarks in their fields and have been cited over 1700 times in peer-reviewed literature. Repeated studies show improvement in laboratory performance globally. The program supports accreditation and guideline development by addressing preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic factors. It has contributed to quality assurance through standardized metrics and international benchmarking.
Area of Science:
- Anatomic pathology quality assurance
- Laboratory medicine benchmarking
Background:
National benchmarks for anatomic pathology have been limited in scope and consistency. Prior research has shown that peer-reviewed literature often lacks standardized metrics for quality assurance. That uncertainty drove the need for a program that could establish consistent, repeatable benchmarks. No prior work had resolved how to create a voluntary, subscription-based model for quality assurance. The College of American Pathologists recognized this gap in 1989. Their initiative aimed to address quality assurance in cytopathology, surgical pathology, and autopsy pathology. International participation was essential for broad applicability. The program's success depended on its ability to generate repeatable data for accreditation and guidelines.
Purpose Of The Study:
The Q-Probes program was designed to create national benchmarks in anatomic pathology. It focused on process-, outcome-, and structure-related quality assurance. The initiative aimed to provide a voluntary subscription model for individual studies. The goal was to generate standardized metrics for peer comparison. The program targeted cytopathology, surgical pathology, and autopsy pathology. It sought to fill gaps in preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic factors. The study aimed to support accreditation and guideline development. It aimed to improve laboratory performance through international benchmarking.
Main Methods:
The Q-Probes program used a voluntary subscription model for individual studies. It collected data from hospital-based laboratories across 19 countries. Each study focused on a primary quality indicator and minor indicators. The program addressed preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic factors. It generated national benchmarks for specific quality metrics. The studies were repeated over time to track performance changes. Data were published in peer-reviewed literature. The program supported the creation of accreditation standards and guidelines.
Main Results:
Fifty-two anatomic pathology Q-Probes studies have been conducted to date. One-third of all Q-Probes studies addressed AP metrics. These studies provided the first standardized national benchmarks in their fields. The program has been cited more than 1700 times in peer-reviewed literature. Repeated studies showed improvement in laboratory performance globally. Data from the program were used in accreditation standards and guidelines. The program addressed cytopathology, surgical pathology, and autopsy pathology. It supported quality assurance in preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic stages.
Conclusions:
The Q-Probes program has established important national benchmarks in anatomic pathology. It has supported quality assurance in cytopathology, surgical pathology, and autopsy pathology. The program has demonstrated improvement in laboratory performance over time. Data from the program have been used in accreditation and guideline development. The voluntary subscription model has enabled broad international participation. The program has generated standardized metrics for peer comparison. It has provided the first benchmarks for specific quality metrics in its fields. The program has contributed to the peer-reviewed literature and quality improvement efforts.
Frequently Asked Questions
The program has established 52 national benchmarks in anatomic pathology, cited over 1700 times in peer-reviewed literature.
Q-Probes data have been used to create laboratory accreditation standards and national guidelines.
International participation ensures broad applicability and standardized benchmarks across 19 countries.
Q-Probes address process-, outcome-, and structure-related quality assurance issues in anatomic pathology.
Approximately one-third of all Q-Probes studies address anatomic pathology metrics.
The model allows individual laboratories to subscribe to specific Q-Probes studies for peer comparison.

