Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Calibration of Vector Network Analyzer for Measurements in Radio Frequency Propagation Channels
Published on: June 2, 2020
Verifying performance characteristics of quantitative analytical systems: calibration verification, linearity, and
Anthony A Killeen1, Tom Long, Rhona Souers
1From the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Dr Killeen); the Department of Biostatistics (Mr Long, Ms Souers, and Dr Styer) and the Instrumentation Resource Committee (Ms Ventura), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; and the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Dr Klee).
Context:
Both the regulations in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) and the checklists of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) Laboratory Accreditation Program require clinical laboratories to verify performance characteristics of quantitative test systems. Laboratories must verify performance claims when introducing an unmodified, US Food and Drug Administration-cleared or approved test system, and they must comply with requirements for periodic calibration and calibration verification for existing test systems. They must also periodically verify the analytical measurement range of many quantitative test systems.
Objective:
To provide definitions for many of the terms used in these regulations, to describe a set of basic analyses that laboratories may adapt to demonstrate compliance with both CLIA and the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program checklists for performing calibration verification and for verifying the analytical measurement range of test systems, to review some of the recommended procedures for establishing performance goals, and to provide data illustrating the performance goals used in some of the CAP's calibration verification and linearity surveys.
Data Sources:
The CAP's calibration verification and linearity survey programs, the CLIA regulations, the Laboratory Accreditation Program requirements, and published literature were used to meet these objectives.
Conclusions:
Calibration verification and linearity and analytical measurement range verification should be performed using suitable materials with assessment of results using well-defined evaluation protocols. We describe the CAP's calibration verification and linearity programs that may be used for these purposes.
More Related Videos
10:22Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
08:56Detection of Regulated Ergot Alkaloids in Food Matrices by Liquid Chromatography-Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Published on: November 22, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Quantitative Analysis
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the...
Accuracy and Precision
Glassware Calibration
Volumetric flasks: Volumetric flasks are designed to prepare aqueous solutions of precise volumes accurately with a calibration line on the neck. To calibrate a volumetric flask, it is important to fill it with distilled...