Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
[Optical and scanning electron microscope study of gingival microleakage in Class II composite restorations]
Abstract:
It has been studied the gingival microleakage and the polymerization contraction gap in composites class II restorations. The influence of two different composites, a microparticle [Heliomolar (Vivadent)] and a high filled one [P-50 (3M)], has been compared with different adhesion systems: a) gingival enamel acid-etch technique. b) Dentinal adhesives [Gluma (Bayer) and Scotchbond 2 (3M)]. c) A adhesive varnish [Dentin Protector (Vivadent)]. The gingival microleakage is only prevented when a microparticle composite [Heliomolar (Vivadent)] and a adhesive varnish [Dentin Protector (Vivadent)] are used together.
More Related Videos
05:30Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024