Relationship between pre-implant ejection fraction and outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy in symptomatic
Insights
Patients with severe left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) impairment showed greater LVEF improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Pre-implant LVEF did not predict long-term outcomes in symptomatic CRT patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a key predictor of morbidity and mortality in heart failure.
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is used for advanced heart failure patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between pre-implant LVEF and patient outcomes following CRT.
- To determine if baseline LVEF influences the effectiveness of CRT in advanced heart failure.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of two-year follow-up data from 366 NYHA class III/IV heart failure patients in the MASCOT study.
- Patients received CRT with a class I indication.
- Pre-implant LVEF was stratified into three tertiles for analysis.
Main Results:
- Patients in the lowest LVEF tertile (<22%) showed a significantly greater improvement in LVEF post-CRT compared to those with higher baseline LVEF.
- NYHA class and quality of life scores improved similarly across all LVEF groups.
- No significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality, cardiac death, or hospitalizations among the groups.
Conclusions:
- Symptomatic heart failure patients with severely impaired LVEF experience greater LVEF improvement with CRT.
- Pre-implant LVEF is not predictive of long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in symptomatic patients receiving CRT.
- The enhanced LVEF improvement in severely impaired patients may explain the lack of correlation with long-term outcomes.
Background:
Left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is regarded as a strong predictor for morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients. The aim of the analysis was to assess the relationship between pre-implant LVEF and outcome of patients with advanced heart failure who received cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Methods:
We analysed the two-year follow-up of 366 patients who had been enrolled in the MASCOT study which included NYHA class III/IV patients with a class I CRT indication. Pre-implant LVEF was stratified by tertile.
Results:
The boundaries for pre-implant LVEF were < 22% (n = 128; 18.2 +/- 3.1%; T(low)), 22% to 28% (n = 121; 25.4 +/- 1.4%; T(middle)) and > 28% (n = 117; 32.6 +/- 3.9%; T(high)) for each tertile.Two-year post-implant LVEF was 32.0 +/- 11.5% (T(low)), 33.7 +/- 10.8% (T(middle)) and 36.4 +/- 9.9% (T(high)). T(Iow) had a greater increase between pre- and post-implant LVEF compared to T(middle) (P = 0.03) and T(high) (P = 0.0001). NYHA class improved similarly among the three groups as well as the quality of life score. No significant differences were detected between the three groups for all-cause mortality, cardiac death, all-cause hospitalization, and hospitalization due to worsening heart failure.
Conclusions:
Symptomatic heart failure patients with a wide QRS complex and a severe impaired LV function had a better improvement of their pre-implant LVEF than patients with a more preserved LVEF. This may be one reason that in these patient groups long-term morbidity and mortality were not related to their pre-implant LVEF. Pre-implant LVEF was in symptomatic CRT patients not predictive for their long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure


