Modification of the postrotary nystagmus test for evaluating young children

Zoe Mailloux1, Marco Leão2, Tracy Ann Becerra3

  • 1Zoe Mailloux, OTD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Adjunct Associate Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson School of Health Professions, Thomas Jefferson University, and Professional and Program Development Consultant, 407 Camino de Encanto, Redondo Beach, CA 90277; zoemailloux@gmail.com.

Insights

The postrotary nystagmus (PRN) test can be reliably used in infants and toddlers. This study found that PRN test norms for 5-year-olds are applicable to children under 4 years old.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Vestibular Assessment
  • Neurodevelopmental Testing

Background:

  • The postrotary nystagmus (PRN) test is a key measure for assessing vestibular function.
  • Current norms for the PRN test are established for children aged 4.0–8.11 years.
  • The applicability of these norms to younger children remains underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the validity of the postrotary nystagmus (PRN) test in children younger than the established age norms.
  • To determine if adapted holding positions affect PRN reflex measurements in young children.
  • To compare PRN scores in infants and toddlers (<47 months) with norms for 5-year-old children.

Main Methods:

  • Two studies were conducted involving children aged 4 months to 9 years.
  • Study 1: Assessed PRN in 37 children (4-9 years) in standard and adapted positions.
  • Study 2: Compared PRN in 44 infants/toddlers (2-47 months) with published norms for 5-year-olds.

Main Results:

  • Child-holding position did not significantly affect the PRN reflex.
  • No statistically significant differences were found between PRN scores of children under 4 years old and published norms for 5-year-olds.
  • This suggests current norms for 4-year-olds are applicable to younger children.

Conclusions:

  • The postrotary nystagmus (PRN) test can be effectively used with infants and toddlers.
  • PRN test results in young children can be validly compared to existing norms for 4-year-olds on the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests.
  • Further research is recommended to explore the predictive utility of the PRN test in this younger age group.

Related Concept Videos