Preventing ultimate harm as the justification for biomoral modification.

Area of Science:

• Biotechnology
• Human Enhancement
• Moral Psychology

Background:

• Advocates propose biogenetic modification to amplify human traits such as intelligence and disease resistance.
• Some propose biogenetic modifications to address societal risks, particularly 'Ultimate Harm'.

Purpose of the Study:

• To evaluate the ethical considerations and efficacy of biogenetic modifications for enhancing human moral psychology.
• To assess the argument for modifying children's moral psychology to mitigate existential risks.

Main Methods:

• Philosophical analysis of arguments for and against biogenetic enhancement of moral psychology.
• Examination of the link between enhanced moral psychology and risk mitigation.

Main Results:

• Modifying children's moral psychology is questioned as a primary strategy for preventing 'Ultimate Harm'.
• Adults may be more suitable candidates for psychological modification than children.
• Direct links between morally enhanced individuals and protection from existential threats are not established.

Conclusions:

• While biogenetic modification of moral psychology is discussed, it is not the sole or most effective strategy for mitigating existential risks.
• A general duty for all to contribute to avoiding 'Ultimate Harm' is proposed as a more effective moral strategy.
• Intervention in individual moral psychology raises ethical concerns regarding autonomy and effectiveness.