Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation via Colonoscopy for Recurrent C. difficile Infection
Published on: December 8, 2014
Stool management systems for preventing environmental spread of Clostridium difficile: a comparative trial
Mikel Gray1, Amin Omar, Brenton Buziak
1Mikel Gray, PhD, FNP, PNP, CUNP, CCCN, FAANP, FAAN, University of Virginia, Department of Urology and School of Nursing Charlottesville, VA. Amin Omar, PhD, Innovotech, Inc. Edmonton, Canada. Brenton Buziak, BSc, Innovotech, Inc. Edmonton, Canada.
Two stool management systems were compared for Clostridium difficile contamination. Device 2 showed significantly higher contamination rates on collection bags and tubing interfaces compared to Device 1.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
- Medical Device Technology
- Environmental Contamination Control
Background:
- Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) remain a significant concern.
- Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a common cause of HAIs.
- Stool management systems (SMS) are used to contain bodily fluids and reduce environmental contamination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of two different stool management systems (SMS) in preventing environmental contamination by Clostridium difficile spores and vegetative cells.
- To evaluate contamination levels on device surfaces and in the immediate environment over a 30-day period in a controlled laboratory setting.
Main Methods:
- An in vitro comparison trial was conducted using two SMS over 30 days.
- Systems were filled with sterile canine stool inoculated with C. difficile (10 CFUs/mL).
- Contamination was assessed daily on device surfaces and the environment using culture media; statistical analysis included generalized estimating equations and logistic regression.
Main Results:
- Device 2 exhibited significantly higher contamination rates (83.9%) on collection bag anterior surfaces compared to Device 1 (20.8%) (P < .001).
- Similar significant differences were observed at the tubing/hub interface (Device 2: 86.3% vs. Device 1: 20.8%) (P < .001).
- Absorbent pads under Device 2 showed substantially greater contamination (38.1%) than under Device 1 (0.5%) (P < .001).
Conclusions:
- Stool management systems can effectively limit environmental contamination by C. difficile.
- Significant differences exist between SMS, with potential contributing factors including the tubing/collection bag interface.
- Further clinical studies are warranted to validate these in vitro findings in real-world healthcare settings.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Drugs for Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant IBS
Two specific drugs used in the treatment are alosetron (Lotronex) and eluxadoline (Viberzi). Alosetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, works by slowing the movement of stools in the gut, reducing bowel...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Bacterial Gastroenteritis

