Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

RNA-based Reprogramming of Human Primary Fibroblasts into Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Published on: November 26, 2018
The developmental potential of iPSCs is greatly influenced by reprogramming factor selection
Yosef Buganim1, Styliani Markoulaki2, Niek van Wietmarschen3
1Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
The combination of reprogramming factors significantly impacts induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) quality. The Sall4, Nanog, Esrrb, and Lin28 (SNEL) combination generates higher-quality iPSCs more efficiently than the standard Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and Myc (OSKM) factors.
Area of Science:
- Stem cell biology
- Epigenetics
- Genetics
Background:
- Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are crucial for regenerative medicine.
- Current methods using Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and Myc (OSKM) yield variable iPSC quality.
- High-quality iPSCs are essential for therapeutic applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify reprogramming factor combinations that yield high-quality induced pluripotent stem cells.
- To compare the efficiency of SNEL versus OSKM in generating high-quality iPSCs.
- To investigate molecular differences between high- and low-quality iPSC lines.
Main Methods:
- Utilized tetraploid complementation assays in mice to assess iPSC quality.
- Ectopically expressed Sall4, Nanog, Esrrb, and Lin28 (SNEL) in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs).
- Compared SNEL-generated iPSCs with those generated by OSKM and other factor combinations.
Main Results:
- The SNEL factor combination generated high-quality iPSCs more efficiently than OSKM.
- Key epigenetic markers and global aneuploidy were comparable between high- and low-quality lines.
- Aberrant gene expression, trisomy 8, and abnormal H2A.X deposition distinguished low-quality iPSCs.
Conclusions:
- The choice of reprogramming factors is a critical determinant of iPSC quality.
- SNEL represents a more efficient combination for generating high-quality iPSCs.
- Specific molecular aberrations may serve as biomarkers for iPSC quality assessment.
More Related Videos
13:23Selecting and Isolating Colonies of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Reprogrammed from Adult Fibroblasts
Published on: February 20, 2012
09:07Chemical Reversion of Conventional Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to a Naïve-like State with Improved Multilineage Differentiation Potency
Published on: June 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Somatic...
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Chromatin Modification in iPS Cells
Compact chromatin makes reprogramming difficult. Enzymes, such as histone demethylases and acetyltransferases, are often added during reprogramming to loosen the chromatin, making the DNA more accessible to transcription factors. Molecules that inhibit histone...
Methods of Nuclear Reprogramming