Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.3K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.3K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.9K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.9K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

11.8K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
11.8K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

407
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
407
Bias01:22

Bias

6.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
6.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clopidogrel versus aspirin for coronary artery disease.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Liver and spleen stiffness as assessed by vibration-controlled transient elastography for diagnosing clinically significant portal hypertension in comparison with other elastography-based techniques in adults with chronic liver disease.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Do Updated Calcitonin Thresholds More Accurately Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Medullary Thyroid Cancer?

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2025
Same author

Management of Hepatitis B virus infection in patients on treatment with immunosuppressants or immunomodulators: Position Paper of Associazione Italiana Studio del Fegato (AISF), Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica (AIOM), Gruppo Italiano per il Trapianto di Midollo Osseo (GITMO), Società Italiana di Reumatologia (SIR), Società Italiana Trapianti d'Organo (SITO), Società Italiana di Gastroenterologia (SIGE), Società Italiana di Malattie Infettive e Tropicali (SIMIT).

Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver·2025
Same author

Letter to the Editor: Can we assess the diagnostic accuracy of 2D-SWE for liver fibrosis staging in MASLD?

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2025
Same author

The Concept of "Converse Therapeutic Hierarchy" for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Liver cancer·2025
Same journal

Utility of the diaphragm assessment in acute decompensated heart failure: a case series and a proof-of-concept study.

Internal and emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

When Rosai-Dorfman meets autoimmunity.

Internal and emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Hypocholesterolemia as a predictor of mortality in infective endocarditis.

Internal and emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Correction: Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of internist-performed point-of-care ultrasound in atrial fibrillation: a multicenter study.

Internal and emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Managing emergency department overcrowding: analysis through a dynamic simulation model of the impact of organizational variables on emergency department processes.

Internal and emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Gunshot-induced carotid artery injury: exploring other determined aetiologies of stroke.

Internal and emergency medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K

The ethical problem of randomization.

Agostino Colli1, Luigi Pagliaro, Piergiorgio Duca

  • 1Medical Department, Ospedale A Manzoni AO Provincia di Lecco, Via Eremo 9/11, 23900, Lecco, Italy, a.colli@ospedale.lecco.it.

Internal and Emergency Medicine
|September 8, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) face ethical scrutiny regarding patient benefit. However, randomization ensures scientific validity, making ethically sound research possible when uncertainty exists and trials are well-designed.

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical research ethics
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • A recent statement from the Fondazione Umberto Veronesi ethics committee highlighted ethical concerns in randomized clinical trials (RCTs).
  • The primary ethical issue discussed is that patients in RCTs contribute to medical knowledge but may not directly benefit from the trial's outcomes.
  • Proposed solutions include increased use of clinical databases and early trial termination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the ethical statement concerning randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and address concerns about randomization.
  • To emphasize the ethical and scientific justification for conducting clinical trials, rooted in uncertainty.
  • To reaffirm the role of randomization in ensuring the internal validity and ethical soundness of clinical research.

Main Methods:

  • Critical discussion and ethical analysis of the Fondazione Umberto Veronesi statement on RCTs.
  • Examination of the principle of clinical equipoise as a basis for ethical trial design and patient allocation.
  • Review of the scientific necessity of randomization for unbiased evidence generation.

Main Results:

  • The core scientific and ethical rationale for clinical trials is uncertainty regarding treatment efficacy and safety.
  • Randomization is essential for obtaining unbiased evidence and ensuring equity in treatment allocation.
  • The ethical acceptability of an RCT is linked to the probability of the experimental treatment's success, ideally between 50-70%.

Conclusions:

  • Concerns about a conflict between the scientific and ethical aspects of randomization in RCTs should be mitigated.
  • Scientifically rigorous studies are inherently ethical, with randomization being key to internal validity.
  • Further consideration of ethical aspects in RCTs, particularly concerning their publication, is warranted.