Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antibiotic class with potent in vivo activity targeting lipopolysaccharide synthesis in Gram-negative bacteria.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

The Dawn of Allosteric BCR-ABL1 Drugs: From a Phenotypic Screening Hit to an Approved Drug.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2022
Same author

Crystal structure of the pheromone Er-13 from the ciliate Euplotes raikovi, with implications for a protein-protein association model in pheromone/receptor interactions.

Journal of structural biology·2021
Same author

Versatile microporous polymer-based supports for serial macromolecular crystallography.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2021
Same author

Screening cells for crystals: a synergistic approach.

Journal of applied crystallography·2020
Same author

The specificity of asciminib, a potential treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia, as a myristate-pocket binding ABL inhibitor and analysis of its interactions with mutant forms of BCR-ABL1 kinase.

Leukemia research·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Improving the Success Rate of Protein Crystallization by Random Microseed Matrix Screening
12:24

Improving the Success Rate of Protein Crystallization by Random Microseed Matrix Screening

Published on: August 31, 2013

17.3K

Microseed matrix screening for optimization in protein crystallization: what have we learned?

Allan D'Arcy1, Terese Bergfors2, Sandra W Cowan-Jacob3

  • 1Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.

Acta Crystallographica. Section F, Structural Biology Communications
|September 9, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Protein crystallization is essential for X-ray diffraction studies. Initial screening often yields poor-quality crystals. Classical seeding methods have limitations, especially for difficult proteins. Microseed matrix screening (MMS) is a new approach that transfers seed crystals into unrelated conditions. This method has shown success in generating better crystals and new crystal forms. MMS can be used with robotic systems, making it efficient for drug discovery programs. The study suggests MMS is a valuable tool for improving crystallization outcomes.

Keywords:
crystallizationmicroseed matrix screeningoptimizationprotein crystallizationX-ray diffractioncrystal optimizationdrug discovery

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Derivatization of Protein Crystals with I3C using Random Microseed Matrix Screening
14:04

Derivatization of Protein Crystals with I3C using Random Microseed Matrix Screening

Published on: January 16, 2021

5.0K
Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Screening to Obtain Crystal Hits for Protein Crystallography
06:19

Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Screening to Obtain Crystal Hits for Protein Crystallography

Published on: March 10, 2023

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Improving the Success Rate of Protein Crystallization by Random Microseed Matrix Screening
12:24

Improving the Success Rate of Protein Crystallization by Random Microseed Matrix Screening

Published on: August 31, 2013

17.3K
Derivatization of Protein Crystals with I3C using Random Microseed Matrix Screening
14:04

Derivatization of Protein Crystals with I3C using Random Microseed Matrix Screening

Published on: January 16, 2021

5.0K
Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Screening to Obtain Crystal Hits for Protein Crystallography
06:19

Author Spotlight: High-Throughput Screening to Obtain Crystal Hits for Protein Crystallography

Published on: March 10, 2023

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Structural biology
  • Protein crystallization techniques
  • X-ray diffraction analysis

Background:

Protein crystallization is a key step in structural biology. Initial screening often yields crystals that lack the quality needed for X-ray diffraction. Classical seeding methods involve transferring seed crystals into similar conditions. This approach has limitations for difficult targets. In recent years, a new strategy has emerged. Microseed matrix screening (MMS) transfers seeds into unrelated conditions. This method has shown promise in generating better crystals. It has been used in various research settings. The potential of MMS for drug discovery is notable. However, the full scope of its benefits remains under investigation.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of microseed matrix screening (MMS) in protein crystallization. The goal is to determine how MMS compares to traditional seeding methods. The focus is on identifying conditions where MMS is most useful. The study reviews examples from the literature and in-house projects. It examines outcomes such as crystal form and diffraction quality. The purpose is to assess MMS as an optimization tool. The study also considers its applicability in drug discovery. The findings aim to guide future crystallization efforts.

Main Methods:

The study reviews published examples of MMS applications. It includes data from in-house crystallization projects. The analysis focuses on crystal forms and space groups achieved. The method compares MMS results to traditional seeding outcomes. It evaluates crystal quality based on diffraction metrics. The study also considers the robotic implementation of MMS. It assesses the feasibility of MMS in drug discovery programs. The approach emphasizes practicality and efficiency.

Main Results:

MMS produced multiple crystal forms and space groups. It generated better diffracting crystals than traditional methods. The method succeeded in crystallizing previously uncrystallizable targets. MMS was implemented robotically in several cases. This automation improved throughput and consistency. The results showed improved diffraction quality in many instances. MMS was particularly effective for recalcitrant proteins. The findings suggest MMS is a viable optimization strategy.

Conclusions:

MMS is a practical optimization method for protein crystallization. It offers time and cost advantages over traditional seeding. The method is effective for difficult targets and drug discovery. MMS can generate multiple crystal forms and space groups. It improves diffraction quality in many cases. The robotic implementation supports high-throughput screening. The authors suggest MMS is a valuable addition to crystallization tools. The findings highlight its broad applicability.

MMS is a crystallization optimization method that transfers seed crystals into unrelated conditions. It aims to improve crystal quality and diffraction.

Classical seeding uses similar conditions, while MMS employs unrelated ones. This difference allows MMS to generate new crystal forms.

MMS can crystallize previously uncrystallizable targets. It is compatible with robotic systems, making it suitable for high-throughput drug discovery.

MMS has produced better diffracting crystals and multiple crystal forms. It has also enabled crystallization of challenging proteins.

Yes, MMS can be implemented robotically. This automation improves efficiency and consistency in crystallization experiments.

The authors propose that MMS is a simple, time- and cost-efficient optimization method. It is applicable to many recalcitrant crystallization problems.