Intracorporeal electromechanical tissue morcellation: a critical review and recommendations for clinical practice

Kimberly A Kho1, Ted L Anderson, Ceana H Nezhat

  • 1Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, and Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; and the Atlanta Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery & Reproductive Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
|September 9, 2014
PubMed

Insights

Electromechanical morcellators pose risks of tissue dissemination and injury. Safer alternatives, including contained morcellation or vaginal/minilaparotomy approaches, are preferred to minimize patient harm.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic surgery
  • Minimally invasive surgical techniques

Background:

  • Electromechanical morcellators are associated with iatrogenic tissue dissemination.
  • Complications include seeding of benign and malignant tissues, vascular, and visceral injuries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the risks associated with electromechanical morcellators.
  • To discuss safer alternatives for tissue extraction.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of complications and alternative surgical techniques.
  • Analysis of patient safety considerations.

Main Results:

  • Electromechanical morcellation can lead to abdominal cavity seeding of various tissues, including occult cancers.
  • Vaginal and minilaparotomy extirpation offer safe and effective alternatives.
  • Containment bags mitigate but do not eliminate risks.

Conclusions:

  • Patient safety necessitates minimizing risks of electromechanical morcellation.
  • Alternative minimally invasive techniques are favored.
  • Informed patient consent regarding risks is crucial.