Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

In vitro spinal arthrodesis implant mechanical testing protocols.

R B Ashman1, J E Bechtold, W T Edwards

  • 1Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children, Dallas 75219.

Journal of Spinal Disorders
|December 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Autologous growth factor (agf) mixed with allograft increases fixation of cementless implants: an experimental dog study.

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy·2017
Same author

Infectious disease, fever, and the immune response.

Immunology today·2014
Same author

Interaction of amphiphilic aggregates with cells of the immune system.

Immunology today·2014
Same author

The construction and immunocompetence of totally allogeneic mouse radiation chimeras.

Immunology today·2014
Same author

Neurotrophins in the ventral tegmental area: Role in social stress, mood disorders and drug abuse.

Neuroscience·2014
Same author

Chiari osteotomy for severe deformity in legg-calvé-perthes disease.

Orthopedics·2014

Standardizing mechanical testing for spinal implants is crucial. Consistent methods reduce redundant testing and improve the comparability of results for spinal implant constructs.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Mechanical testing protocols for spinal implants lack standardization.
  • Varied test methods yield inconsistent mechanical property data for spinal constructs.
  • This inconsistency hinders direct comparison of implant performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline key considerations for the mechanical assessment of spinal implants.
  • To advocate for standardized testing methodologies.
  • To facilitate the comparison of spinal implant evaluation results.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of existing mechanical testing protocols for spinal implants.
  • Identification of critical parameters influencing mechanical test outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of recommendations for standardized testing and data interpretation.

    • Main Results:

    • Different mechanical test methods produce significantly different results for spinal implant constructs.
    • Lack of standardization leads to redundancy in testing efforts.
    • Standardized approaches can enhance the reliability and comparability of mechanical testing data.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized mechanical testing protocols are essential for evaluating spinal implants effectively.
    • Adoption of uniform methods will reduce redundant research and improve data consistency.
    • Standardization facilitates more reliable comparisons of spinal implant performance across studies.