Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Visual Agnosia

Visual Agnosia

Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Re-examining electrophysiological evidence for proactive suppression of salient visual distractors.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025

Same author

Changing the speed and order of attentional selection in visual search.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025

Same author

A Subtype Perspective on Cognitive Trajectories in Healthy Aging.

Brain sciences·2024

Same author

Neuroimaging and machine learning for studying the pathways from mild cognitive impairment to alzheimer's disease: a systematic review.

BMC neurology·2023

Same author

Attentional enhancement predicts individual differences in visual working memory under go/no-go search conditions.

PLoS biology·2022

Same author

Does cognitive aging follow an orchid and dandelion phenomenon?

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2022

Same journal

Sensorimotor Adaptation of Vocal Pitch Is Impaired in Cerebellar Ataxia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Memory in the Palm of Your Hand: Smartphone-based Methods for Measuring Memory in the Wild.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Processing Asymmetry in Object-modifying Relative Clauses: Evidence from Functional Connectivity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Extensive Experience Remodels Neural Task Circuitry to Escape the Frontal Bottleneck and Increase Automaticity of Categorization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Distilling the Neurophenomenological Signatures of Pure Awareness during Transcendental Meditation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Searching for inefficiency in visual search.

Gregory J Christie¹, Ashley C Livingstone, John J McDonald

¹Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

|September 10, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Visual search inefficiency isn't due to serial processing but rather the time needed to process the target. Task relevance can make items "pop out" faster, especially with repeated target colors.

More Related Videos

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Visual Perception
Human Attention

Background:

Visual search time typically increases with item quantity, historically attributed to serial attention.
Decades of debate question whether search is truly serial or influenced by other factors.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the neurophysiological basis of visual search inefficiency.
To determine if search is serial or if processing time after target identification is the main factor.
To examine the effect of target repetition on visual search performance.

Main Methods:

Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to record event-related potentials (ERPs) in human participants.
Participants performed visual search tasks involving displays with multiple colored items.
Target color repetition across trials was manipulated.

Main Results:

Search inefficiency was linked to the time for selective target processing, not serial search.
Target "pop-out" time decreased when the target color repeated across trials.
Task relevance influenced the pop-out effect, making inconspicuous items more salient.

Conclusions:

Visual search inefficiency is primarily driven by post-selection processing time.
Repeated target relevance enhances visual search efficiency through faster target "pop-out".
Neurophysiological measures are crucial for understanding the mechanisms of visual search inefficiency.