Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A moving overlay shrinks the attentional blink.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2014

Same author

Tuning characteristics of the top-down attentional setting.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2013

Same author

A new object captures attention--but only when you know which objects are old.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2011

Same author

A new object captures attention--but only when you know it's new.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2009

Same author

Object substitution masking: when does mask preview work?

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2008

Same author

Capturing focused attention.

Perception & psychophysics·2007

Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Attentional capture by dynamic cues.

¹Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore, 119260, Singapore, fkchua@nus.edu.sg.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

|September 11, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Existing objects that change their motion capture attention, but only when observers are primed to detect dynamic features. This finding highlights the role of attentional set in visual attention.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Visual Perception

Background:

Visual attention is typically drawn to abrupt onsets that alter the visual scene.
It remains unclear if changes in an existing object's dynamic status can also capture attention.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether an existing object that begins rotating captures attention automatically.
To determine if both motion-onset and trajectory features contribute to attentional capture.

Main Methods:

Four experiments were conducted using a letter-identification task.
An object composed of four spots began rotating, presenting motion-onset and trajectory features.
Observer's attentional set was manipulated by varying the target's diagnostic feature across experiments.

Main Results:

The rotating object only captured attention when the attentional system was specifically set to monitor dynamic features.
Automatic attentional capture was dependent on the observer's attentional set.

Conclusions:

Attentional capture by dynamic changes in existing objects is not automatic but contingent on attentional set.
The visual system prioritizes dynamic features when primed to do so, influencing attentional capture.