Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nominal Level of Measurement00:56

Nominal Level of Measurement

25.4K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. Not every statistical operation can be used with every set of data. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal...
25.4K
Measurement: Standard Units03:38

Measurement: Standard Units

61.4K
Every measurement provides three kinds of information: the size or magnitude of the measurement (a number), a standard of comparison for the measurement (a unit), and an indication of the uncertainty of the measurement. While the number and unit are explicitly represented when a quantity is written, the uncertainty is an aspect of the errors in the measurement results.
61.4K
Measurement: Derived Units03:02

Measurement: Derived Units

41.8K
The International System of Units or SI system, by international agreement, has fixed measurement units for seven fundamental properties: length, mass, time, temperature, electric current, amount of substance, and luminosity. These are called the SI base units.
41.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

93.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
93.8K
Measurements of Strain01:27

Measurements of Strain

2.8K
Strain quantifies the deformation of a material under force, typically measured as normal strain, which represents the change in length when compared with the original length. Electrical strain gauges are used for enhanced accuracy. These devices consist of a conductive wire mounted on a paper backing that adheres to the material's surface. These gauges operate on the piezoresistive effect, where the wire's electrical resistance changes in response to mechanical deformation. The strain...
2.8K
Ratio Level of Measurement00:54

Ratio Level of Measurement

13.6K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....
13.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Utility and Robustness of Sentence Repetition as a Marker of Developmental Language Disorder: An Analysis of the Surrey Communication and Language in Education Study Project Data.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Evaluation of the Crosslinguistic Nonword Repetition Test: Evidence From a Large and Diverse Secondary Data Set.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same author

Convergent Validity of the Cross-Linguistic Lexical Task.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2025
Same author

Vocabulary interventions for children with developmental language disorder: a systematic review.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Revisiting nonword repetition as a clinical marker of developmental language disorder: Evidence from monolingual and bilingual L2 Cantonese.

Brain and language·2024
Same author

Sentence Repetition as a Diagnostic Tool for Developmental Language Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

4.7K

Sentence repetition: what does the task measure?

Kamila Polišenská1, Shula Chiat, Penny Roy

  • 1Language and Communication Science, City University London, London, UK; School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
|September 12, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Children’s sentence repetition relies more on morphosyntax and word familiarity than semantics. Findings support sentence repetition tasks for assessing language development and identifying specific language impairment.

Keywords:
assessmentchildrencross-linguisticsentence repetitionspan task

More Related Videos

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing
04:30

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

Published on: October 25, 2019

5.3K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

4.7K
An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing
04:30

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

Published on: October 25, 2019

5.3K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Linguistic development in children
  • Clinical linguistics
  • Language acquisition

Background:

  • Sentence repetition is increasingly used to assess children's language abilities and identify specific language impairment.
  • However, the exact linguistic knowledge tapped by these tasks remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different types of linguistic knowledge affect immediate sentence recall in young children.
  • To assess the age sensitivity of sentence repetition tasks for children aged 4–5 years.
  • To determine if these effects are consistent across typologically different languages, specifically English and Czech.

Main Methods:

  • 50 English-speaking and 50 Czech-speaking 4–5-year-olds participated.
  • Children repeated stimuli across seven conditions, from full sentences to non-words, to measure recall span.
  • Linguistic factors manipulated included syntactic correctness, semantic plausibility, prosody, and word familiarity.

Main Results:

  • Morphosyntax and lexical familiarity significantly impacted sentence recall spans in both languages.
  • Syntactic violations and non-words had the largest negative effect, while semantic implausibility and lack of prosody had smaller effects.
  • Function word familiarity was more critical than content word familiarity; effects were consistent across languages and ages (4–5 years).

Conclusions:

  • Sentence repetition performance in young children is primarily driven by morphosyntactic and lexical-phonological knowledge, particularly function words.
  • These findings confirm the utility of sentence repetition tasks for research and clinical assessment of language abilities, including specific language impairment.
  • The cross-linguistic consistency suggests a robust underlying mechanism for sentence processing in early development.