Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
Quantification and correlation of hip capsular volume to demographic and radiographic predictors
Jonathan M Frank1, Simon Lee1, Frank M McCormick2
1Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hip Preservation Center, Rush University Medical Center, Rush Medical College of Rush University, 1611 W. Harrison St, Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to develop a novel method to quantify hip capsular volume in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery, utilizing magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) and to determine whether there are demographic or radiological factors that are associated with capsular volume.
Methods:
A retrospective review was performed from 2006 to 2014 of consecutive patients who presented with hip pain and received a hip MRA and plain radiographs. All patients were suspected of soft tissue injury due to underlying femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). A novel technique using Osirix MD for the quantification of capsular and femoral head volumes was described.
Results:
Ninety-seven patients met the study criteria and were included for analysis. The average total capsular volume (including the femoral head) measured 79.89 ± 20.35 cm(3), average femoral head volume 46.68 ± 12.32 cm(3), and average true capsular volume measured 33.20 ± 12.58 cm(3). Average total capsular:femoral head volume ratio was 1.74 ± 0.27. Significant differences were seen between genders for total capsular volume (P < 0.01), femoral head volume (P < 0.01), and true capsular volume (P < 0.01). Total capsular volume:femoral head ratio was greater for females, but was not statistically significant (n.s.). Femoral head volume significantly correlated with alpha angle (P < 0.01), height (P < 0.01), BMI (P < 0.01), BMI (P = 0.02), and age (P < 0.01). Total capsular volume significantly correlated with height (P < 0.01), BMI (P = 0.01), and age (P < 0.01). Age was also correlated with true capsular volume (P = 0.011). No significant differences in capsular volumes were found between normal and abnormal radiographic measurements.
Conclusion:
The current study describes a reproducible radiographic measurement for hip capsule volumes from MRAs. Only gender was predictive of total capsular volume, femoral head volume, and true capsular volume. There were no macroscopic anatomical differences evident on MRA. This method showed good intra- and inter-observer reliability and can aid in future research regarding hip capsule volumes. This novel technique may potentially allow clinicians a readily available and reliable method to detect large and redundant capsules, a possible predisposition for hip micro-instability.
Level Of Evidence:
Retrospective case series, Level IV.
