Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

1.1K
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
1.1K
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion01:24

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

742
Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
742
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

1.0K
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
1.0K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

834
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
834
Equilibrium and Balance01:15

Equilibrium and Balance

6.1K
The inner ear assumes dual functionalities of auditory perception and equilibrium maintenance. The vestibule is the organ responsible for balance. This organ contains mechanoreceptors, specifically hair cells, endowed with stereocilia, which aid in deciphering information regarding the position and motion of our heads. Two intrinsic components, the utricle and saccule, help perceive head position, while the semicircular canals track head movement. Neurological messages initiated in the...
6.1K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

1.0K
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Cadenza lyric intelligibility prediction (CLIP) dataset.

Data in brief·2026
Same author

The First Cadenza Challenge: Perceptual Evaluation of Machine Learning Systems to Improve Audio Quality of Popular Music for Those with Hearing Loss.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Audio-visual speech-in-noise tests for evaluating speech reception thresholds: A scoping review.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Breathing Rate as a Marker for Noise-Induced Stress in Guinea Pigs.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

International Consortium on Ageing-Related Pathologies (ICCARP) Audiovestibular Group: fostering international consensus to refine International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) codes for hearing loss across the life course.

GeroScience·2025
Same author

The cadenza woodwind dataset: Synthesised quartets for music information retrieval and machine learning.

Data in brief·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 23, 2026

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

14.0K

The moving minimum audible angle is smaller during self motion than during source motion.

W Owen Brimijoin1, Michael A Akeroyd1

  • 1Scottish Section, Institute of Hearing Research, Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Glasgow, UK.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|September 18, 2014
PubMed
Summary

The auditory system stabilizes sound perception during head movements. Self-motion is processed more accurately than source motion, indicating active sensory compensation for head turns.

Keywords:
auditory motionhead movementsmotion trackingself-motion compensationsound localizationspatial hearing

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.3K
Three Dimensional Vestibular Ocular Reflex Testing Using a Six Degrees of Freedom Motion Platform
10:12

Three Dimensional Vestibular Ocular Reflex Testing Using a Six Degrees of Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: May 23, 2013

15.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 23, 2026

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

14.0K
Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.3K
Three Dimensional Vestibular Ocular Reflex Testing Using a Six Degrees of Freedom Motion Platform
10:12

Three Dimensional Vestibular Ocular Reflex Testing Using a Six Degrees of Freedom Motion Platform

Published on: May 23, 2013

15.8K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Vestibular System

Background:

  • The human head moves in three dimensions, altering auditory cues.
  • Despite head motion, static sound sources are perceived as stable.
  • This suggests the auditory system compensates for self-motion, similar to the vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test if self-motion is processed more accurately than source motion.
  • To investigate the auditory system's ability to stabilize spatial sound perception.
  • To compare auditory spatial acuity during self-induced versus externally-induced motion.

Main Methods:

  • Used an infrared motion tracking system to record head angle.
  • Employed real-time head-related impulse response interpolation for head-stabilized audio signals.
  • Measured the moving minimum audible angle (MMAA) for normal and hearing-impaired listeners under self-motion and source-motion conditions.

Main Results:

  • The moving minimum audible angle (MMAA) was approximately 1-2° smaller for self-motion compared to source-motion.
  • This improved accuracy occurred even when the motion relative to the head was identical in both conditions.
  • Both normal and hearing-impaired listeners demonstrated this effect.

Conclusions:

  • Auditory spatial processing actively compares acoustic cues with self-motion information.
  • The auditory system demonstrates a robust mechanism for stabilizing sound source perception during head movements.
  • This stabilization relies on integrating vestibular and auditory sensory inputs.