Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children
Published on: September 11, 2018
[Diagnostic value of high mobility group box 1 for acute appendicitis in children]
Jian-Fen Hu1, Jiang-Yan Wu, Lin Zhang
1Department of Emergency, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha 410007, China. hujianfenbaobao@sina.com.
Insights
High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) shows potential in diagnosing pediatric acute appendicitis. Elevated HMGB1 levels were observed in children with appendicitis, aiding in diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Pediatric Medicine
- Diagnostic Markers
Context:
- Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency in children.
- Accurate and timely diagnosis is crucial to prevent complications.
- Current diagnostic methods can have limitations.
Purpose:
- To investigate the diagnostic utility of serum High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1) levels in pediatric acute appendicitis.
- To compare HMGB1 levels between children with and without appendicitis.
Summary:
- Serum HMGB1 levels and white blood cell (WBC) counts were significantly higher in children with appendicitis compared to healthy controls.
- The appendicitis group exhibited higher HMGB1 levels (median 32.9 ng/mL) than the non-appendicitis group (median 22.0 ng/mL).
- Serum HMGB1 demonstrated a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 82.9% for diagnosing acute appendicitis at a cutoff of 28.0 ng/mL.
Impact:
- HMGB1 may serve as a valuable biomarker for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis.
- This finding could lead to improved diagnostic strategies and patient outcomes.
- Further research can explore HMGB1's role in differentiating appendicitis severity.
Objective:
To evaluate the value of high mobility group box 1(HMGB1) in the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis.
Methods:
The children with acute abdomen who had a diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis between January and July 2013 and 25 healthy children were enrolled in this study. Serum HMGB1 levels were measured using ELISA on admission. The patients were classified into 2 groups according to surgery confirmation or pathological results: appendicitis (n=28) and non-appendicitis (n=35).
Results:
Serum HMGB1 levels and WBC in the appendicitis and non-appendicitis groups were significantly higher than in the healthy children group (P<0.01). The appendicitis group showed more increased serum HMGB1 levels compared with the non-appendicitis group (median: 32.9 ng/mL vs 22.0 ng/mL; P<0.01). For a diagnosis of acute appendicitis, the sensitivity and specificity of serum HMGB1 was 71.4% and 82.9% respectively at the best cutoff of 28.0 ng/mL, with the accuracy of 77.8% and the area under the curve of 0.765 (95%CI 0.638-0.893).
Conclusions:
HMGB1 may play a role in the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis.
More Related Videos
05:45Diagnosis of Hirschsprung's Disease by Immunostaining Rectal Suction Biopsies for Calretinin, S100 Protein and Protein Gene Product 9.5
Published on: April 26, 2019
08:51Murine Appendectomy Model of Chronic Colitis Associated Colorectal Cancer by Precise Localization of Caecal Patch
Published on: August 24, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Appendicitis
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.