Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Chi-square Analysis02:46

Chi-square Analysis

28.8K
The chi-square test is a statistical hypothesis test. It is used to check whether there is a significant difference between an expected value and an observed value. In the context of genetics, it enables us to either accept or reject a hypothesis, based on how much the observed values deviate from the expected values.
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
28.8K
Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

99.7K
Overview
99.7K
Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

11.8K
11.8K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

52.9K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
52.9K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

62.2K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
62.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.4K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Simultaneous immunomodulation and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition drives lung adenocarcinoma progression.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Recombination and structural variation in a large 8-founder wheat MAGIC population.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2025
Same author

Multiomics Analysis Reveals Molecular Changes during Early Progression of Precancerous Lesions to Lung Adenocarcinoma in Never-Smokers.

Cancer research·2024
Same author

On randomized sketching algorithms and the Tracy-Widom law.

Statistics and computing·2023
Same author

Increased accuracy of starch granule type quantification using mixture distributions.

Plant methods·2017
Same author

Partial identification in the statistical matching problem.

Computational statistics & data analysis·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis
10:08

Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis

Published on: August 12, 2019

13.6K

Characterizing uncertainty in high-density maps from multiparental populations.

Daniel Ahfock1, Ian Wood1, Stuart Stephen2

  • 1School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia 4072.

Genetics
|September 20, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New methods quantify genetic map uncertainty in multiparental populations, crucial for accurate quantitative trait loci (QTL) discovery. This research provides guidelines for sample sizes needed for high-certainty genetic mapping.

Keywords:
High-density genotyping, Multiparent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross (MAGIC)MPPMultiparental populationsSingle nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)linkage mapmultiparental populationsrecombinant inbred linerecombination fractionvariability

More Related Videos

Microsatellite DNA Genotyping and Flow Cytometry Ploidy Analyses of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Hydatidiform Molar Tissues
11:54

Microsatellite DNA Genotyping and Flow Cytometry Ploidy Analyses of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Hydatidiform Molar Tissues

Published on: October 20, 2019

8.3K
Robust 3D DNA FISH Using Directly Labeled Probes
12:16

Robust 3D DNA FISH Using Directly Labeled Probes

Published on: August 15, 2013

37.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis
10:08

Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis

Published on: August 12, 2019

13.6K
Microsatellite DNA Genotyping and Flow Cytometry Ploidy Analyses of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Hydatidiform Molar Tissues
11:54

Microsatellite DNA Genotyping and Flow Cytometry Ploidy Analyses of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Hydatidiform Molar Tissues

Published on: October 20, 2019

8.3K
Robust 3D DNA FISH Using Directly Labeled Probes
12:16

Robust 3D DNA FISH Using Directly Labeled Probes

Published on: August 15, 2013

37.4K

Area of Science:

  • Quantitative Genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Genomic Mapping

Background:

  • Multiparental populations offer higher polymorphism and recombination rates than biparental populations, making them valuable for high-density genetic mapping.
  • Existing methods for quantifying genetic map uncertainty (marker order and intermarker distances) are computationally intensive or assess uncertainty for order or distance independently.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel statistical methods for simultaneously quantifying uncertainty in marker order and intermarker distances within multiparental populations.
  • To provide guidelines on optimal population size and marker density for robust genetic map construction.

Main Methods:

  • Derived the asymptotic joint distribution of maximum composite likelihood estimators for intermarker distances.
  • Developed hypothesis tests and confidence intervals for simultaneous assessment of marker-order instability and distance uncertainty.
  • Conducted simulations to evaluate the impact of marker density, population size, and founder distribution on map confidence.

Main Results:

  • The new approach effectively quantifies simultaneous uncertainty in marker order and intermarker distances.
  • Simulation results provide insights into factors influencing genetic map confidence in multiparental populations.
  • Guidelines for sample sizes required for sub-centimorgan marker density mapping with high certainty were established.

Conclusions:

  • The developed statistical framework enables robust genetic map uncertainty assessment in multiparental populations.
  • This methodology is crucial for improving the reliability of quantitative trait loci (QTL) discovery.
  • The study validated the approach using a bread wheat Multiparent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross (MAGIC) population.