Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
Macular inner plexiform and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma
Hyun-Ho Jung1, Mi-Sun Sung, Hwan Heo
1*MD †MD, PhD Department of Ophthalmology, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, Korea (all authors).
Macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness is a valuable diagnostic tool for both normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). While comparable to peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness, mGCIPL loss in NTG is localized, unlike the diffuse loss seen in POAG.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Glaucoma Research
- Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Imaging
Background:
- Glaucoma diagnosis relies on detecting retinal nerve fiber layer damage.
- Macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness is a potential biomarker for glaucoma.
- Differentiating between normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is crucial for treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness measurements between NTG and POAG using Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography (OCT).
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of mGCIPL thickness against peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness in glaucoma detection.
Main Methods:
- Enrolled 100 normal controls, 80 NTG patients, and 80 POAG patients.
- Measured mGCIPL and pRNFL thickness using Cirrus HD-OCT.
- Calculated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AROCs) and Pearson correlation coefficients with visual field mean deviation (MD).
Main Results:
- All mGCIPL parameters differed significantly between controls and glaucoma patients.
- POAG showed greater reductions in superior mGCIPL and pRNFL thickness with higher AROCs compared to NTG.
- Both mGCIPL and pRNFL parameters correlated with MD, with specific parameters showing stronger associations in NTG versus POAG.
Conclusions:
- mGCIPL thickness demonstrates diagnostic capability comparable to pRNFL thickness in both NTG and POAG.
- mGCIPL loss in NTG is predominantly inferior, whereas POAG exhibits more diffuse mGCIPL thinning.
Related Concept Videos
Glaucoma: Overview
Anatomy of the Eyeball

