Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Age-structured next generation matrix and R<sub>0</sub> calculation for <i>Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis</i> (MAP).

Infectious Disease Modelling·2026
Same author

Genomic prediction in insects: a case study on wing morphology traits in the jewel wasp Nasonia vitripennis.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2025
Same author

Towards assessing indirect genetic effects in dairy cattle.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2025
Same author

Genetic parameters and potential of reducing tail and ear damage in pigs through breeding.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2025
Same author

How partial phenotyping to reduce generation intervals can help to increase annual genetic gain in selected honeybee populations.

Heredity·2025
Same author

Estimating mutation rate and characterising single nucleotide de novo mutations in pigs.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Monitoring Colony-level Effects of Sublethal Pesticide Exposure on Honey Bees
10:35

Monitoring Colony-level Effects of Sublethal Pesticide Exposure on Honey Bees

Published on: November 15, 2017

10.3K

Methods to estimate breeding values in honey bees.

Evert W Brascamp, Piter Bijma

    Genetics, Selection, Evolution : GSE
    |September 20, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This article introduces a new mathematical approach to calculate genetic merit in honey bees, accounting for their unique reproductive system where colonies contain many related workers from a single queen.

    Keywords:
    quantitative geneticsMendelian samplingnumerator relationship matrixgenetic variance components

    Frequently Asked Questions

    More Related Videos

    In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors
    08:50

    In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors

    Published on: July 16, 2018

    7.8K
    Assessing Agrochemical Risk to Mated Honey Bee Queens
    08:49

    Assessing Agrochemical Risk to Mated Honey Bee Queens

    Published on: March 3, 2021

    2.6K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 23, 2026

    Monitoring Colony-level Effects of Sublethal Pesticide Exposure on Honey Bees
    10:35

    Monitoring Colony-level Effects of Sublethal Pesticide Exposure on Honey Bees

    Published on: November 15, 2017

    10.3K
    In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors
    08:50

    In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors

    Published on: July 16, 2018

    7.8K
    Assessing Agrochemical Risk to Mated Honey Bee Queens
    08:49

    Assessing Agrochemical Risk to Mated Honey Bee Queens

    Published on: March 3, 2021

    2.6K

    Area of Science:

    • Quantitative genetics and breeding values in agricultural sciences
    • Computational biology applied to honey bee population genomics

    Background:

    No prior work had resolved how to accurately calculate genetic merit for honey bees due to their complex reproductive biology. Standard animal models rely on assumptions that fail when applied to these social insects. Colonies contain thousands of workers sharing a single mother but having multiple fathers. Drones are haploid, meaning they carry only one set of chromosomes from their mother. This unique structure creates complex genetic correlations among siblings that standard software cannot handle. That uncertainty drove the need for specialized matrices to track these relationships. Researchers have long struggled to adapt traditional livestock models to this specific population structure. This paper addresses the gap by providing a framework for calculating genetic relationships in these colonies.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The aim of this study is to develop efficient methodologies for estimating breeding values in honey bee populations. Standard animal models fail to address the unique reproductive biology of these insects. The researchers seek to resolve the challenge posed by colonies containing thousands of workers from a single queen. They focus on the complex correlations among full-sibs that arise from this mating structure. This work addresses the need for a matrix that accounts for these non-diagonal Mendelian sampling terms. By deriving the numerator relationship matrix, the authors intend to improve the accuracy of genetic evaluations. They also aim to provide a method that allows for the numerical inversion of these complex matrices. This research is motivated by the desire to enhance selection programs in apiculture through better statistical modeling.

    Main Methods:

    The study employs a computational approach to derive the numerator relationship matrix for honey bee populations. Reviewing the genetic structure, the authors develop algorithms to calculate the covariance matrix of Mendelian sampling terms. This design accounts for the non-diagonal nature of these terms caused by the specific reproductive mode. The team constructs a block-diagonal matrix that simplifies numerical inversion processes. They incorporate the distribution of progeny from queens and drones to refine the model. Simulation techniques validate the performance of the proposed estimators against known genetic values. The researchers compare these results to existing approximate methods to quantify potential improvements. This systematic framework provides a rigorous basis for evaluating genetic merit in social insects.

    Main Results:

    The strongest finding indicates that the proposed estimated breeding values serve as unbiased predictors of true genetic merit. Simulation results demonstrate that the new methodology successfully accounts for correlated Mendelian sampling terms. The derived matrix is a block-diagonal structure, which facilitates efficient numerical inversion for large datasets. The team reports that the gain in response to selection is approximately five percent compared to previous approximate techniques. This modest increase suggests that the primary value of the model lies in its mathematical precision. The authors show that the relationship matrix and its inverse can be effectively developed for these populations. Their analysis confirms that the method can be used to estimate variance components alongside genetic merit. These results provide a comprehensive validation of the proposed computational framework.

    Conclusions:

    The authors demonstrate that their derived relationship matrix allows for accurate estimation of genetic merit in honey bee populations. Their approach successfully accounts for the complex correlations inherent in colony-level data. The resulting estimates are shown to be unbiased predictors of the true genetic values. While the gain in selection response is modest at approximately five percent, the method remains robust. The researchers suggest that the benefits may be more significant when calculating genetic variance components. This work provides a necessary tool for breeders to improve selection accuracy in these insects. The study establishes a clear path for integrating these models into existing genetic evaluation programs. These findings offer a refined perspective on managing genetic diversity within managed colonies.

    The researchers propose a method using a block-diagonal matrix to account for correlated Mendelian sampling terms. This approach allows for the numerical inversion of the relationship matrix, which is necessary to weigh information from relatives within a colony appropriately.

    The authors utilize the numerator relationship matrix and its inverse, which are adapted for the unique haploid-diploid structure of honey bees. This tool is essential for calculating genetic covariance among individuals within a colony.

    A block-diagonal matrix is necessary because the Mendelian sampling terms of full-sibs are correlated in honey bees. This structure allows for efficient numerical inversion, unlike standard models where such matrices are typically diagonal.

    The researchers incorporate the within-colony distribution of progeny from drone-producing queens and drones. This data type ensures that the model correctly weighs information from various relatives during the estimation process.

    The simulation indicates that the estimated breeding values are unbiased predictors of true values. This measurement confirms the accuracy of the proposed model compared to the actual genetic potential of the colonies.

    The authors suggest that while selection response gains are limited to about five percent, the method may offer greater advantages when estimating genetic parameters. This implication highlights the potential utility of the approach for broader population studies.