Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

29.6K
Overview
29.6K
Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

13.0K
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
13.0K
Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

18.5K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
18.5K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

2.9K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
2.9K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.4K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.4K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

1.7K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"It Is Not Possible to Balance It Easily": A Phenomenological Study Exploring the Experience of Work-Family Conflict in Contemporary Chinese Society.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Similarity-based reasoning in conceptual spaces.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Conceptual spaces and the strength of similarity-based arguments.

Cognition·2021
Same author

Structured decision-making drives guidelines panels' recommendations "for" but not "against" health interventions.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2019
Same author

The Psychology of Uncertainty and Three-Valued Truth Tables.

Frontiers in psychology·2018
Same author

Understanding Conditionals in the East: A Replication Study of With Easterners.

Frontiers in psychology·2018
Same journal

Pronoun Resolution in Turkish: The Interplay of Referential Form, Word Order, and Implicit Causality.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

What's in a Color?: Language, Synesthesia, and Categorical Perception.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Reasoning Beyond Explicit Rules: Adults' and Children's Use of Closure Principles in Novel Cases.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Intermediary Object States Are Activated by Sentences Describing Completed Events.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Large Language Models Estimate Fine-Grained Human Color-Concept Associations.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Computational Models of Causal Reasoning: Bayesian Accounts of Normative Violations.

Cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K

The probability of iterated conditionals.

Janneke van Wijnbergen-Huitink1, Shira Elqayam, David E Over

  • 1Department of Philosophy, University of Groningen.

Cognitive Science
|September 20, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores how people understand complex conditional statements, comparing iterated "if p, then if q, r" with noniterated "if p and q, then r" forms. Results support a probabilistic model for interpreting these logical structures.

Keywords:
Decision-theoretic account of reasoningDefective truth tableIndicative conditionalsIterated conditionalsProbability

More Related Videos

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

10.9K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K
A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

10.9K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Philosophical Logic
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Research on simple conditional understanding is extensive, yet iterated conditionals remain understudied psychologically.
  • Iterated conditionals (e.g., If p, then if q, r) present unique comprehension challenges compared to simpler forms.
  • Philosophical logic offers diverging predictions on iterated conditional interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To psychologically investigate the understanding of iterated conditionals versus noniterated forms.
  • To compare experimental findings with predictions from philosophical and psychological theories.
  • To identify individual differences influencing conditional reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental comparison of iterated and noniterated conditional forms.
  • Utilized probability evaluation and truth-table tasks for data collection.
  • Incorporated qualitative individual difference measures.

Main Results:

  • Evidence strongly supports the probabilistic Adams conditional model.
  • Findings align with the "new paradigm" in conditional reasoning research.
  • Demonstrated significant differences in how iterated and noniterated conditionals are processed.

Conclusions:

  • The probabilistic Adams conditional provides a robust framework for understanding iterated conditionals.
  • Psychological data challenges traditional philosophical interpretations of complex conditionals.
  • Highlights the importance of probabilistic approaches in cognitive science of reasoning.