Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Assessment of the Cytotoxic and Immunomodulatory Effects of Substances in Human Precision-cut Lung Slices
Published on: May 9, 2018
Evaluation of in silico models for the identification of respiratory sensitizers
Sander Dik1, Janine Ezendam2, Albert R Cunningham3
1*Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands, Department of Toxicogenomics, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, and Centre for Safety of Substances and Products, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands *Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands, Department of Toxicogenomics, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, and Centre for Safety of Substances and Products, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Low molecular weight (LMW) respiratory sensitizers can cause occupational asthma but due to a lack of adequate test methods, prospective identification of respiratory sensitizers is currently not possible. This article presents the evaluation of structure-activity relationship (SAR) models as potential methods to prospectively conclude on the sensitization potential of LMW chemicals. The predictive performance of the SARs calculated from their training sets was compared to their performance on a dataset of newly identified respiratory sensitizers and nonsensitizers, derived from literature. The predictivity of the available SARs for new substances was markedly lower than their published predictive performance. For that reason, no single SAR model can be considered sufficiently reliable to conclude on potential LMW respiratory sensitization properties of a substance. The individual applicability domains (ADs) of the models were analyzed for adequacies and deficiencies. Based on these findings, a tiered prediction approach is subsequently proposed. This approach combines the two SARs with the highest positive and negative predictivity taking into account model specific chemical AD issues. The tiered approach provided reliable predictions for one-third of the respiratory sensitizers and nonsensitizers of the external validation set compiled by us. For these chemicals, a positive predictive value of 96% and a negative predictive value of 89% were obtained. The tiered approach was not able to predict the other two-thirds of the chemicals, meaning that additional information is required and that there is an urgent need for other test methods, e.g., in chemico or in vitro, to reach a reliable conclusion.
More Related Videos
10:10Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface
Published on: February 23, 2020
09:29An Air-liquid Interface Bronchial Epithelial Model for Realistic, Repeated Inhalation Exposure to Airborne Particles for Toxicity Testing
Published on: May 13, 2020