Manipulation detection and preference alterations in a choice blindness paradigm.
Fumihiko Taya1, Swati Gupta2, Ilya Farber3
1SINAPSE Institute for Cognitive Science and Neurotechnologies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Plos One
|September 24, 2014
Summary
Individuals often fail to notice choice manipulations and confabulate reasons for their decisions. This study reveals that choice blindness can alter preferences, even when participants believe they are aware of their choices.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Decision Science
Background:
- Common belief posits individuals make choices based on preferences and understand their reasoning.
- Recent research challenges this, particularly in choice blindness paradigms where manipulations are often undetected.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate factors influencing detection of choice blindness manipulations.
- Examine the temporal duration and nature of preference alterations following these manipulations.
Main Methods:
- Participants engaged in a computerized choice blindness task involving face attractiveness ratings.
- Manipulations involved replacing chosen faces with unselected ones, with participants providing explanations.
- Attractiveness and similarity ratings were collected immediately and after two weeks.
Main Results:
- Manipulation detection rates were low, increasing with prior detections and modulated by choice certainty.
- Preferences were demonstrably altered in the short term, aligning with the manipulated choice.
- Preference alterations occurred in both manipulated and non-manipulated explanation trials.
Conclusions:
- Choice blindness is a robust phenomenon with significant implications for understanding decision-making.
- Detection of manipulations is influenced by individual and trial-specific factors.
- Induced preferences can persist, highlighting the malleability of decision-making processes.
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
10.7K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.7K
Blinding
2.9K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.9K


